After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 166728 - meta_display_set_input_focus_window called with a timestamp of 0
meta_display_set_input_focus_window called with a timestamp of 0
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: metacity
Classification: Other
Component: general
2.9.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Metacity maintainers list
Metacity maintainers list
Depends on:
Blocks: 155450
 
 
Reported: 2005-02-08 23:14 UTC by Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail)
Modified: 2005-02-09 03:15 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
testcase (805 bytes, text/plain)
2005-02-08 23:16 UTC, Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 		  Details
Metacity verbose log (2.68 KB, text/plain)
2005-02-08 23:17 UTC, Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 		  Details
If we're not passed a timestamp, we need to get one (just like we did in good 'ol bug bug 152000) (690 bytes, patch)
2005-02-08 23:23 UTC, Elijah Newren 		accepted-commit_now Details | Review

Description Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2005-02-08 23:14:52 UTC 
I am getting the "Window manager warning: meta_display_set_input_focus_window
called with a timestamp of 0 for window 0x480001b (Bug List).  This shouldn't
happen!" warning quite a bit when opening urls with galeon.

This appears to be because we use gtk_window_present() outside a gtk event, so
it passes a 0 time to the window manager.

Testcase coming up.
Comment 1 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2005-02-08 23:16:02 UTC 
Created attachment 37215 [details]
testcase
Comment 2 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2005-02-08 23:17:16 UTC 
Created attachment 37216 [details]
Metacity verbose log

This is the metacity verbose log from where the error happens.
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2005-02-08 23:23:48 UTC 
Created attachment 37217 [details] [review]
If we're not passed a timestamp, we need to get one (just like we did in good 'ol bug bug 152000)
Comment 4 Elijah Newren 2005-02-09 03:15:31 UTC 
committed.