GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 165730
logged into root, it crashed
Last modified: 2005-01-30 21:40:29 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Package: gnome-utils Severity: normal Version: GNOME2.8.0 0.17 Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc Synopsis: logged into root, it crashed Bugzilla-Product: gnome-utils Bugzilla-Component: gdict Bugzilla-Version: 0.17 BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0) Description: Description of the crash:just logged into root, and it crashed Steps to reproduce the crash: 1. log out account 2. log in as root 3. watch it crash Expected Results: How often does this happen? first time, i shall try it again Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eggcups' (no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208154432 (LWP 16245)] [New Thread -1220768848 (LWP 16251)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208154432 (LWP 16245)] [New Thread -1220768848 (LWP 16251)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208154432 (LWP 16245)] [New Thread -1220768848 (LWP 16251)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0x0046e7a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
+ Trace 55100
Thread 1 (Thread -1208154432 (LWP 16245))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2005-01-30 13:51 ------- Unknown version 0.17 in product gnome-utils. Setting version to "unspecified". Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other". Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gnome-utils". Setting to default milestone for this product, '---' The original reporter of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Previous reporter was nicholaskelly16@gmail.com. Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED". Setting qa contact to the default for this product. This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 160111 ***