After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 162909 - g-i-t lacks a gnome-fs-trash-{empty,full}-accept
g-i-t lacks a gnome-fs-trash-{empty,full}-accept
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Product: adwaita-icon-theme
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Jakub Steiner
Jakub Steiner
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-01-04 11:30 UTC by Danielle Madeley
Modified: 2005-01-31 09:38 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Description Danielle Madeley 2005-01-04 11:30:20 UTC 
These icons are used by trashapplet (and perhaps nautilus) when you drag
something over the trash to drop it.

Currently trash applet displays the ugly red X.
Comment 1 Danielle Madeley 2005-01-20 06:24:06 UTC 
Related to bug 163848
Comment 2 Jakub Steiner 2005-01-20 14:26:07 UTC 
red ugly X? It remains gnome-fs-trash.png for me and highlights it the usual
way... This would make much more sense if we had a closed trash bin like we used
to, but for an open trash?
Comment 3 Danielle Madeley 2005-01-20 15:29:52 UTC 
Jimmac, in 2.9? The ugly red X is the Gtk image not found image.

I was trying to think how we would indicate 'accept'. Perhaps an arrow pointing
into the trash bin?
Comment 4 Jakub Steiner 2005-01-31 05:10:03 UTC 
But why would you want a special state for this? We have the standard color
hightlight already... 

Adding unnecersary states only adds maintanance overhead...
Comment 5 Danielle Madeley 2005-01-31 05:49:57 UTC 
Other themes have them?

(that's probably not a great reason)
Comment 6 Jakub Steiner 2005-01-31 08:11:31 UTC 
I'm not saying other themes don't need them. If you have a trashcan with a lid,
you probably want to have a state of the lid open. But for an open trash it's
unnecersary. The open state should not be mandatory.
Comment 7 Danielle Madeley 2005-01-31 08:16:16 UTC 
Ok.

There is code that was added at some point to deal with the lack of accept icons
if we don't have them. So this is not really an issue any longer.

You can close this if you don't want to have these icons.