GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 160201
Crashes when starting up with printer turned off.
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Package: eggcups Severity: normal Version: GNOME2.8.0 unspecified Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc Synopsis: Crashes when starting up with printer turned off. Bugzilla-Product: eggcups Bugzilla-Component: notification Bugzilla-Version: unspecified BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0) Description: Description of the crash: The application consistently crashes when starting up if the configured parallel printer us powered off. Steps to reproduce the crash: 1. 2. 3. Expected Results: How often does this happen? Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eggcups' (no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151161152 (LWP 4668)] [New Thread 59419568 (LWP 4670)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151161152 (LWP 4668)] [New Thread 59419568 (LWP 4670)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151161152 (LWP 4668)] [New Thread 59419568 (LWP 4670)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0x006877a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
+ Trace 53058
Thread 1 (Thread -151161152 (LWP 4668))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-12-02 06:20 ------- Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other". Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "eggcups". Setting to default milestone for this product, '---' The original reporter of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Previous reporter was rich@dubrawski.net. Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED". Setting qa contact to the default for this product. This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 160111 ***