GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 159406
eggcups crashes in combination with gdmflexiserver
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Package: gnome-utils Severity: normal Version: GNOME2.8.0 0.17 Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc Synopsis: eggcups crashes in combination with gdmflexiserver Bugzilla-Product: gnome-utils Bugzilla-Component: gdict Bugzilla-Version: 0.17 BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0) Description: Description of the crash: An error window appears at the log in. Is not possible to close. Steps to reproduce the crash: 1. start gdmflexiserver 2. log in as different user 3. CRASH! How often does this happen? everytime Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eggcups' (no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151120192 (LWP 6891)] [New Thread 35638192 (LWP 6893)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151120192 (LWP 6891)] [New Thread 35638192 (LWP 6893)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151120192 (LWP 6891)] [New Thread 35638192 (LWP 6893)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0x0072c7a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
+ Trace 52628
Thread 1 (Thread -151120192 (LWP 6891))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-11-25 01:48 ------- Unknown version 0.17 in product gnome-utils. Setting version to "unspecified". Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other". Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gnome-utils". Setting to default milestone for this product, '---' The original reporter of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Previous reporter was ei1soda@chl.chalmers.se. Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED". Setting qa contact to the default for this product. This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 151307 ***