GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 159153
eggcups quits on startup
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Package: gnome-utils Severity: normal Version: GNOME2.8.0 0.17 Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc Synopsis: eggcups quits on startup Bugzilla-Product: gnome-utils Bugzilla-Component: gdict Bugzilla-Version: 0.17 BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0) Description: Description of the crash: "eggcups has quit" alert box Steps to reproduce the crash: 1. startup into gnome 2. close error to popup up new error again Expected Results: How often does this happen? everytime Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eggcups' (no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151185120 (LWP 3294)] [New Thread 64531376 (LWP 3296)] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151185120 (LWP 3294)] [New Thread 64531376 (LWP 3296)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151185120 (LWP 3294)] [New Thread 64531376 (LWP 3296)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0x007417a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
+ Trace 52480
Thread 1 (Thread -151185120 (LWP 3294))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-11-22 22:38 ------- Unknown version 0.17 in product gnome-utils. Setting version to "unspecified". Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other". Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gnome-utils". Setting to default milestone for this product, '---' The original reporter of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Previous reporter was bousquet@usc.edu. Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED". Setting qa contact to the default for this product. This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 151307 ***