GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 158908
eggcups notification after logout when usb printer switched off
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Package: gnome-utils Severity: normal Version: GNOME2.8.0 1.1.0 Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc Synopsis: eggcups notification after logout when usb printer switched off Bugzilla-Product: gnome-utils Bugzilla-Component: gdict Bugzilla-Version: 1.1.0 BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0) Description: Description of the crash: usb printer was switched off. left on for reboot as test. When next logout from Gnome and re-login eggcups nofitication on screen - and could not re-set (also a gnome volume manager message also) Steps to reproduce the crash: 1. 2. 3. Expected Results: How often does this happen? This is the first time Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-volume-manager' (no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -151181088 (LWP 3542)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0x00b467a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
+ Trace 52340
Thread 1 (Thread -151181088 (LWP 3542))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-11-21 07:21 ------- Unknown version 1.1.0 in product gnome-utils. Setting version to "unspecified". Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other". Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gnome-utils". Setting to default milestone for this product, '---' The original reporter of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Previous reporter was mdc1@york.ac.uk. Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED". Setting qa contact to the default for this product. This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
I have now seen that is is related to the known bug 140081 I guess this should be closed or cross-referenced ? For reference I am running fc3 final and updated as of 21 Nov 04 Machine is a Dell Dimension 2400 Apologies Mike
It doesn't match that bug at all. However, it is a duplicate of bug 158733. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 158733 ***