After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 158150 - Filters vs. Script-Fu
Filters vs. Script-Fu
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 116145
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: User Interface
2.0.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-11-13 06:34 UTC by Albert Cahalan
Modified: 2004-11-13 19:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Albert Cahalan 2004-11-13 06:34:55 UTC
There may be an implementation distinction between Filters and Script-Fu,
but to the user, these are one and the same. Thus, they should be merged.

If more than one top menu level is desired, the splitting should be
done via some distinction that doesn't expose GIMP internals in the UI.
Comment 1 Michael Schumacher 2004-11-13 07:38:01 UTC
Please don't just report bugs without searching for similiar ones. Your
reputation will thank you for this some day :)
Comment 2 Manish Singh 2004-11-13 07:39:35 UTC
Yeah, spamming the bug tracker with ill researched or poorly thought out garbage
is a waste of our time. Why don't you spend some time researching what's come
before, instead of jumping in and annoying everybody?
Comment 3 Albert Cahalan 2004-11-13 14:06:36 UTC
I think that "jumping in" is the very best way to report UI bugs.
Only a newcomer, or one who hasn't used GIMP in years (me), will
be well-suited to discovering UI bugs. This is why usability testing
is done by careful observation of people who don't know the software
very well. If I remain a regular GIMP user, my ability to report these
problems will quickly decline as I come to tolerate them.

Bugzilla says "Zarro Boogs found." for a "Script-Fu Filters" search.
I take that to mean that nobody else has reported this.

When I change the query to get RESOLVED, VERIFIED, and CLOSED bugs I only
see this one. Had a found others though, that would merely be an indication
of high demand.

Consider these two:

Script-Fu->Alchemy->Clothify
Script-Fu->Alchemy->Unsharp Mask

From the user's point of view, how are these not filters? Most of Script-Fu
belongs under Filters->Toys.

Comment 4 Sven Neumann 2004-11-13 15:44:12 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 116145 ***
Comment 5 Manish Singh 2004-11-13 17:28:17 UTC
As Sven noted, there *is* a bugzilla bug about this, not to mention a few
threads on the mailing list (even recent ones), and even a menu organization
page on the wiki.

It's very very obvious that you didn't even try to research what's come before,
and instead want to waste developer time on duplicate bugs.
Comment 6 Albert Cahalan 2004-11-13 17:52:15 UTC
I searched for: Script-Fu Filters

(so, I did indeed try to research this)

Neither "Script-Fu" nor "Filters" are in the summary for the other bug.
Your bugzilla is set to only search the summaries by default, which
is 99% useless.

Besides, your bugzilla instructions imply that it is normal for bugs to
be reported multiple times. This is one of the documented reasons for a
bug priority to be set to "High".

Right here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/bug_status.html#priority

If people didn't re-report bugs, part of the bugzilla documentation
would be meaningless. :-)
Comment 7 Manish Singh 2004-11-13 17:57:46 UTC
Your attempt to save face isn't working. Fact is, this was discussed on the
mailing list *recently*, and the menu reorg page is very easily found on the
wiki, since it's linked from the usability section, which is plainly linked from
the frontpage.

So it's *everywhere*. You simply did not do basic research. Don't try to justify
yourself. You screwed up.
Comment 8 Albert Cahalan 2004-11-13 18:09:03 UTC
Of course I didn't search mailing lists or a wiki. Even if this topic is
there, it doesn't matter. This topic belongs in the bugzilla.

Also, if the topic is "*everywhere*", that's yet another reason to mark
it high priority. See the GNOME bugzilla documentation for why.
Comment 9 Manish Singh 2004-11-13 18:10:51 UTC
Argument by assertion will not get you anywhere.
Comment 10 Albert Cahalan 2004-11-13 19:34:22 UTC
Wrestling with a pig surely won't get me anywhere.

If you are uninterested in fixing problems, you have no reason to waste time
dealing with bugzilla. If the mailing lists and wiki are what you like,
well there you go. Be happy. Abusing bug submitters who make minor mistakes
doesn't exactly help improve the GIMP.

A search for bugzilla bugs in the GNOME bugzilla reveals that I'm not the
first person to search only the summaries, not by a long shot.

Goodbye sir. I hope you have a better day tomorrow.
Comment 11 Manish Singh 2004-11-13 19:45:23 UTC
If this was your only mistake, I would've let it slide. But you chose to flood
the bugzilla with poorly thought out and ill researched reports. And now you're
whining because you got called on it.

You're getting this treatment because your poor bugzilla flooding is an
indication of a larger problem with you.
Comment 12 Sven Neumann 2004-11-13 19:50:20 UTC
Duplicates are reported frequently and it is in general not a problem. We locate
the duplicate and mark the new bug as such. Happens several times each day and
usually doesn't need any further discussion. Most users learn from this mistake
and do a better search next time. The point is that you are accusing us of not
caring (even though we told you that we care and that there's ongoing effort to
improve the menus). Worse, you are trying to tell us how to use Bugzilla. That
is rather arrogant behaviour and it is not surprising that it upsets people over
here.