GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 154646
pictures not properly displayed
Last modified: 2005-01-14 00:00:24 UTC
Distribution: Debian 3.1 Package: gpdf Severity: normal Version: GNOME2.6.1 unspecified Gnome-Distributor: Debian Synopsis: pictures not properly displayed Bugzilla-Product: gpdf Bugzilla-Component: general Bugzilla-Version: unspecified Description: Description of Problem: I prepare chemical formulas with latex (xymtex) and pdflatex. These look good in gnome-gv but not in the gnome-pdf viewer. Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. get latex (tetex-bin), xymtex 2. -- use the pdflatex command on the file -- use the sequenz latex dvips and ps2pdf on the file 3. view the results with gnome-gv, gnome-pdf viewer and the acrobat-mozilla plugin Actual Results: The lines connecting the atoms and displaying the structure are displayed in the pdf-file only in gnome-gv, acrobat but not in gnome-pdf viewer Expected Results: the pictures should look all the same. How often does this happen? always Additional Information: Debian Sarge with packages from tetex-bin, xymtex from a miktex-distribution \documentclass[12pt,a4paper,twoside]{article} \usepackage[ngerman]{babel} \usepackage[latin9]{inputenc} \fontencoding{T1} %Dateien f\"{u}r Xymtex \usepackage{carom} %heteroaromaten \usepackage{chemist,fusering,chemstr,aliphat,lowcycle,hetarom,locant,hcycle,ccycle,methylen} \selectlanguage{ngerman} \unitlength6500sp \newcommand{\cholesterin}{\steroidchain[e]{% {{3}B}==HO;{{10}SB}==;{{13}SB}==;% {{20}S}==% }} \begin{document} \cholesterin \end{document ------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-10-06 04:16 ------- Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other". Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gpdf". Setting to default milestone for this product, '---' The original reporter of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Previous reporter was bernhard.kleine@mne.uka.de. Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED". Setting qa contact to the default for this product. This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Could you possibly attach a pdf with a bad rendering ? Revent versions of gpdf have improved a lot in the handling of latex pdf, so it's possible this bug has already been fixed in gpdf 2.8.
Created attachment 32760 [details] example of bad rendered PDF Example of a badly rendered PDF in gpdf, from a private communication from the reporter. Marking as new, may be a duplicate...
type3 fonts, that's a duplicate of #112506 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112506 ***