After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 149305 - Automatically created Dockbook set of books does not validate
Automatically created Dockbook set of books does not validate
Status: VERIFIED INCOMPLETE
Product: conglomerate
Classification: Other
Component: Code - DTD Conformance
CVS
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: conglomerate list
conglomerate list
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-08-04 17:32 UTC by Michèle Garoche
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Document set created by conglomerate (198 bytes, text/xml)
2004-08-04 17:34 UTC, Michèle Garoche 		  Details
book set hacked so that it validates (239 bytes, text/xml)
2004-08-04 17:35 UTC, Michèle Garoche 		  Details
the requested/needed addition in unified diff format. (351 bytes, text/plain)
2004-08-12 10:52 UTC, Geert Stappers 		  Details
produces a valid set over here (1.23 KB, patch)
2004-08-12 11:25 UTC, Geert Stappers 		none Details | Review

Description Michèle Garoche 2004-08-04 17:32:01 UTC 
1 - Click on new
2 - Choose set of Docbook's documents
3 - Apply
4 - Validate

The newly created document does not validate.

For this to work, at least one book should be described; i.e. a book tag and its corresponding required 
title element should be added.
Comment 1 Michèle Garoche 2004-08-04 17:34:44 UTC 
Created attachment 30211 [details]
Document set created by conglomerate
Comment 2 Michèle Garoche 2004-08-04 17:35:36 UTC 
Created attachment 30212 [details]
book set hacked so that it validates
Comment 3 Geert Stappers 2004-08-04 18:52:22 UTC 
See also bug 149306
Comment 4 Geert Stappers 2004-08-12 09:36:11 UTC 
I think I can help here. Assigning it.
Comment 5 Geert Stappers 2004-08-12 10:52:17 UTC 
Created attachment 30465 [details]
the requested/needed addition in unified diff format.
Comment 6 Geert Stappers 2004-08-12 11:25:17 UTC 
Created attachment 30467 [details] [review]
produces a valid set over here

Waits on an approval from Dave.
Comment 7 David Malcolm 2004-08-17 19:41:07 UTC 
Patch id 30467 looks good to me
Comment 8 David Malcolm 2004-10-14 02:26:43 UTC 
Did this get applied in the end?
Comment 9 Michèle Garoche 2004-10-14 03:45:16 UTC 
Yes, applied August 19th (version 1.50)