After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 149292 - memprof crash on save
memprof crash on save
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 97756
Product: memprof
Classification: Other
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: MemProf Maintainers
MemProf Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-08-04 15:21 UTC by brian
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description brian 2004-08-04 15:21:23 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang)
Package: memprof
Severity: major
Version: GNOME2.6. unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc
Synopsis: memprof crash on save
Bugzilla-Product: memprof
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.6.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:

Debugging custom server app.  Can run leak checker, gets results.  Also
outputs some warnings:

memintercept (25140): _MEMPROF_SOCKET = /tmp/memprof.58s0gG
memintercept (25140): New process, operation = NEW, old_pid = 0
memprof: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.5: No symbols
memprof: Bad address
memprof: /lib/libgcc_s-3.3.3-20040413.so.1: No symbols
memprof: /usr/lib/libmemintercept.so: No symbols

** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/16 in block 0xe79e98:
Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/2 in block 0xe79e90:
Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/115 in block
0xf1a300: Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/178 in block
0xf1a020: Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/2787 in block
0x104e060: Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/1026 in block
0x104d040: Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/16 in block
0x1192060: Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/11 in block
0x1192030: Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/8 in block 0x11bd05c:
Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/2 in block 0x11bd054:
Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/5208 in block
0xbe27a80: Input/output error


** (memprof:25137): WARNING **: Cannot read word 0/2983 in block
0xbe24be0: Input/output error


Steps to reproduce the crash:
1.
2.
3.

Expected Results:


How often does this happen?

This happens reliably (for this application).  I've used memprof
successfully on other apps.

Additional Information:

No, I'm not keeping this data/version of program around to regenerate
bug.  But if needed, I can do so in the future.


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/memprof'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -150187904 (LWP 25137)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...0x006de402 in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread -150187904 (LWP 25137))

  • #0 ??
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 process_dump_stack
  • #5 leaks_print
  • #6 save_leak_cb
  • #7 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_button_clicked
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_button_get_relief
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_cclosure_new_swap
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_button_released
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_button_get_relief
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_marshal_VOID__UINT_STRING
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_cclosure_new_swap
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 gtk_widget_send_expose
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #30 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #31 gdk_x11_register_standard_event_type
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_main_depth
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #34 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #35 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #36 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #37 main
  • #0 ??




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-08-04 11:21 -------


Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "memprof".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was brian@cse.lehigh.edu.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 John Gardiner Myers 2004-09-11 00:37:52 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 97756 ***