After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 146836 - Crashed when order by CPU load and change monitored processes
Crashed when order by CPU load and change monitored processes
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 156831
Product: atk
Classification: Platform
Component: gail
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: padraig.obriain
System-monitor maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-06-23 20:09 UTC by tunnie
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.5/2.6



Description tunnie 2004-07-09 11:28:09 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang)
Package: gnome-applets
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.6. 2.5.x
Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc
Synopsis: Crashed when order by CPU load and change monitored processes
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-applets
Bugzilla-Component: cpuload
Bugzilla-Version: 2.5.x
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.6.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:
Using version 2.6.0, the program crashed when I had enabled the '% CPU'
column and then tried to order by this column, with 'All Processes'
selected.

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. Preferences > Enable '% CPU' monitoring.
2. Order by '% CPU' column.
3. Use the selector in top-right to change which processes to monitor

Expected Results:
Application crashes suddenly.

How often does this happen?
Every time I try it.

Additional Information:
Using version 2.6.0


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -151072640 (LWP 32453)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0x0024e402 in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread -151072640 (LWP 32453))

  • #0 ??
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gail_tree_view_ref_focus_cell
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
  • #10 g_child_watch_add
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_main_depth
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 main
  • #0 ??



------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-07-09 07:28 -------


Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gnome-applets".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was tunnie@uk2.net.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Danielle Madeley 2004-10-10 11:50:57 UTC
Reassigning to system-monitor.
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2004-11-03 20:47:27 UTC
Reassigning to gail based on the stack trace (kick me if I'm wrong).  Note that
the only other stack trace that appears to contain
gail_tree_view_ref_focus_cell() in the stack trace is bug 138885.
Comment 3 padraig.obriain 2004-11-04 09:07:23 UTC
This looks like a duplicate of bug 156831 to me. Unfortunately I cannot
reproduce this one either.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 156831 ***