Bug 146721 – systhematic crash gnoom-terminal

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 146721 - systhematic crash gnoom-terminal


Summary:	systhematic crash gnoom-terminal


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 121675

Product:	gnome-terminal
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other other

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers
QA Contact:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2004-06-19 01:58 UTC by rub
Modified:	2004-12-22 21:47 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.5/2.6

Description rub 2004-07-09 09:24:09 UTC

Distribution: Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang)
Package: gnome-panel
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.6. 2.6.0
Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc
Synopsis: systhematic crash gnoom-terminal
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-panel
Bugzilla-Component: clock applet
Bugzilla-Version: 2.6.0
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.6.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:


Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -151046368 (LWP 6590)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...0x00709402 in ?? ()

+ Trace 48130

Thread 1 (Thread -151046368 (LWP 6590))

#0 ??
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 libgnomeui_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 g_type_check_instance_cast
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5 gail_widget_new
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
#6 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_signal_emit_by_name
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_widget_get_default_direction
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 g_object_run_dispose
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_box_set_child_packing
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 gtk_container_class_list_child_properties
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_cclosure_new_swap
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_signal_emit_by_name
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_widget_get_default_direction
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 g_object_interface_list_properties
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 g_object_steal_data
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 g_value_unset
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#32 gtk_container_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 terminal_window_remove_screen
#34 remove_notify
#35 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#36 g_cclosure_new_swap
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#37 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#38 g_signal_emit_by_name
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#39 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#40 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#41 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#42 gtk_widget_get_default_direction
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#43 gtk_window_remove_embedded_xid
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#44 g_object_run_dispose
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#45 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#46 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#47 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#48 gdk_x11_register_standard_event_type
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#49 g_main_depth
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#50 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#51 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#52 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#53 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#54 main
#0 ??





------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-07-09 05:24 -------


Unknown version 2.6.0 in product gnome-panel. Setting version to "1.5.x".
Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gnome-panel".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was rub@alchimix.org.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Vincent Untz 2004-07-09 13:05:51 UTC

Doesn't look like an useful stack trace, but I'll let the gnome-terminal guys
decide.

Comment 2 Olav Vitters 2004-07-09 18:09:30 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 121675 ***

Comment 3 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2004-07-10 03:40:07 UTC

Olav, are you sure you mean 121675 here?