After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 140007 - Search option for GConf-editor dose not exist
Search option for GConf-editor dose not exist
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 82902
Product: gconf-editor
Classification: Applications
Component: general
git master
Other Linux
: High enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Gconf Editor Maintainers
Gconf Editor Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-04-14 07:25 UTC by Sujay SA and Varadharaj KP
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.3/2.4

Attachments
the attachment gives the implementation of search option for gconf-editor (28.08 KB, patch)
2004-04-14 07:53 UTC, Sujay SA and Varadharaj KP 		none Details | Review

Description Sujay SA and Varadharaj KP 2004-04-14 07:25:29 UTC 
Since searching a key within the tree structure is very difficult when the tree size is large. It is 
very essential to have a searching mechanism for this purpose.
Comment 1 Sujay SA and Varadharaj KP 2004-04-14 07:53:42 UTC 
Created attachment 26641 [details] [review]
the attachment gives the implementation of search option for gconf-editor

This patch requires that two new files gconf-find-dialog.h and
gconf-find-dialog.c need to be created , before testing this patch in the
gconf-editor. The content of the files is clearly shown in the patch.
Any comments on this are considered, and we work for the improvements.
Comment 2 Fernando Herrera 2004-04-14 12:57:33 UTC 
Hi Sujay!
Thanks for your work. I've updated you patch in order to apply it cleanly. It
had lines wrapped (maybe you text editor did it). Also, when adding new files,
it's better to include them in the patch (I usually do a plain diff between two
directories). Also for the next time try to do the patch against cvs HEAD and
only with the changes for this bug (your patch cointained some schemas stuff,
probabily from another old patch).

I'll make this bug a duplicate of #82902 and I'll attach you patch there, and
also will comment there.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 82902 ***