After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 138186 - Planner should assign a default name to new tasks or resources.
Planner should assign a default name to new tasks or resources.
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: planner
Classification: Other
Component: General
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: planner-maint
planner-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-03-26 09:57 UTC by Lincoln Phipps
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Lincoln Phipps 2004-03-26 09:57:03 UTC
Simply add in a new Task, (resource or Group) and it uses blank 
names. It also uses identical blank names. This is a bit confusing 
for new users.

Maybe we do what Ganttproject does (a GPL project in Java). For 
tasks it does...

"New task_x"

where x is the WBS. Given Richard has done the WBS this'll 
be a nice feature to use his WBS.

It doesn't actual do anything for Resources so we should go 
further and do,

"New resource_y"

where y is simply the id.

The strings "New", "task" and "resource" would be localisd 
to suit using existing methods.

Lincoln.
Comment 1 Richard Hult 2004-03-26 10:33:45 UTC
I'm not sure this will add much...

We put the cell in editing mode, so the user should type in something right
away. I doubt that many users in any case would want a boilerplate name like
"New task". Except for testing and debugging, which doesn't count ;)

(And using the WBS will probably be confusing since as soon as you insert a task
in between other tasks, or move them around, the WBS and "New task N" won't line
up anymore.)

Comment 2 Lincoln Phipps 2004-03-26 14:29:16 UTC
Yup Richard - you're right about the WBS - scratch that part of the 
idea - maybe just an autoincremented number.

I'll think about this - just feel more happy with something in 
the field as opposed to nothing. 
Comment 3 Richard Hult 2004-04-04 23:40:18 UTC
I'm going to veto this ;).
Comment 4 Lincoln Phipps 2004-04-05 05:16:35 UTC
OK I'm happy - having WBS kind of makes it less an issue.