After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 135675 - Nautilaus Crashes while attempting to Navigate Network
Nautilaus Crashes while attempting to Navigate Network
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 107741
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Navigation
2.2.x
Other other
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-02-28 11:37 UTC by randall craig
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description randall craig 2004-02-28 11:37:31 UTC
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: 2.2.1
Synopsis: Nautilaus Crashes while attempting to Navigate Network
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: Navigation
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1)

Description:
Description of Problem: I was trying to open a network computer using
samba and it kept looking for the network so i typed in the name of the
workgroup and then it failed and came back with the error

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Attempted a second time and it came up just fine 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?
this was the first time


Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1087937376 (LWP 4127)]
[New Thread 1142106944 (LWP 4143)]
[New Thread 1133718464 (LWP 4142)]
[New Thread 1125329984 (LWP 4141)]
[New Thread 1116941504 (LWP 4140)]
[New Thread 1099660608 (LWP 4139)]
0xffffe002 in ?? ()

Thread 5 (Thread 1116941504 (LWP 4140))

  • #0 ??
  • #1 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 _init
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #4 _init
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #5 get_file_type
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #6 get_file_type
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #7 get_file_type
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #8 gnome_vfs_get_file_info_uri_cancellable
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #9 _gnome_vfs_job_go
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #10 _gnome_vfs_job_execute
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #11 _gnome_vfs_job_queue_shutdown
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #12 _gnome_vfs_thread_pool_init
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #13 g_static_private_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 start_thread
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-02-28 06:37 -------

Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 Martin Wehner 2004-02-29 22:49:31 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been
reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report
any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 107741 ***