After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 132413 - windows on all workspaces should only show up in one workspace switcher window
windows on all workspaces should only show up in one workspace switcher window
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 87531
Product: metacity
Classification: Other
Component: EWMH specification
2.6.x
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Metacity maintainers list
Metacity maintainers list
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-01-24 17:59 UTC by csh
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description csh 2004-01-24 18:27:49 UTC
Distribution: Slackware Slackware 9.1.0
Package: metacity
Severity: enhancement
Version: GNOME2.4.1 2.6.x
Gnome-Distributor: Dropline_Systems
Synopsis: windows on all workspaces should only show up in one workspace switcher window
Bugzilla-Product: metacity
Bugzilla-Component: EWMH specification
Bugzilla-Version: 2.6.x
Description:
Please describe your feature request:

If you make an application window visible on all desktops, it will show
up in the workspace switcher on all of the desktops.

While this does reflect reality, it clutters the switcher display.

I believe it would be much more useful to have windows only show up
where they are currently displayed or located.




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-01-24 13:27 -------

Reassigning to the default owner of the component, metacity-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 Fernando Herrera 2004-02-12 11:38:21 UTC
If we put it in the current workspace view only, how can we know that
it's on _every_ workspace?. I think knowing that a windows is on all
workspaces is useful information. Maybe we can use a different
metaphor like a coloured border, but it is not so clear.
Havoc, what do you think about this?
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2004-02-12 17:45:24 UTC
I have to agree with Fernando on this one.  I would find it confusing
to have it do what csh suggests.  Anyway, that's my $0.02...
Comment 3 Rob Adams 2004-02-12 17:51:15 UTC
Yea I'd have to agree -- we want the workspace switcher to show an
accurate picture.
Comment 4 csh 2004-02-13 19:32:05 UTC
I understand wanting the accurate picture, but I don't see this
providing useful information.

Couldn't you get that inforamtion if you tag the window border to show
that it is pinned on all workspaces?

I find it very distracting and confusing to see windows appear
everywhere on the switcher, especially if they are large.  It's not so
bad when they are focused, because they get focus and are put on top
in the switcher too.

But otherwise, there is no way to tell from the switcher display if it
is one global window, or several windows that happen to be in the same
place on different screens.

If you have more than one of these currently open, it gets worse.

So, maybe a compromise: highlight them in some way so you know they
are sticky when showing them in the switcher.

I think that would remove my primary complaints about this feature.
Comment 5 Rob Adams 2004-02-13 19:38:23 UTC
isn't the fact that they show up on all the workspaces a pretty good
indication that the window is sticky?
Comment 6 csh 2004-02-16 17:53:15 UTC
No, it isn't, because it is very common for different windows to be in
the same location on each of several screens.  You can't tell them
from a sticky window.

It's very common for those of us who often have terminal windows on
several screens in the same position.

If you are going to clutter a UI with something like a sticky window,
then it should not be ambiguous.
Comment 7 Rob Adams 2004-02-16 20:54:37 UTC
The UI is hardly cluttered with sticky windows.  What windows show up
in the workspace switcher and are sticky by default?
Comment 8 csh 2004-02-20 00:01:48 UTC
I said nothing about default sticky windows. 

I said that you cannot tell a sticky window from a series of different
windows in the same position, when the sticky window is not focused. 
This is self-inconsistent with the situation if the sticky window
is focused, where it will be highlighted on all desktops.

It would be nice to highlight the sticky windows in the switcher. 
That way you can tell the difference between sticky windows, and
multiple windows in the same location.

If you don't agree, fine.  Close the bug.
Comment 9 Rob Adams 2004-02-28 16:24:14 UTC
I'm gonna close for now.  If you want to discuss this further, bring
it up on usability@ and cc me and/or Havoc.
Comment 10 Elijah Newren 2004-09-17 16:40:34 UTC
This is a duplicate of a libwnck bug, so I'm reopening in order to mark it as
such.  (While I personally don't care for this requested feature, I believe
Michael presents some good arguments in bug 87531 for the behavior requested
here, and shows from a usability perspective the potential disadvantages of it
as well as advantages; he additionally points out that some kind of renaming
would be necessary if this feature was adopted to avoid confusion.  It looks to
me like a trade-off between (1) easily understandable behavior for the average
user who only has a few windows and probably no more than one sticky one, and
(2) the usefulness of the pager for the expert user who has lots of windows
including multiple sticky ones.)
Comment 11 Elijah Newren 2004-09-17 16:40:47 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 87531 ***