GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 122412
opaque crop preview, please
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
In the current crop tool, I can select a rectangle using the standard rubberbanding method. When I have selected the rectangle to which I want to crop, I click in it or hit the Crop button and the image is cut down. This works OK, but I think drawing the rectangle's outline is not the best way to really give a visual impression of what the effect of the cropping will be. The human eye still sees the parts of the picture that are outside the rectangle. This is particularly true if you're trying to crop a photo to get a particular aesthetic effect or visual balance. I find that I get better results by cropping repeatedly and undoing, or shrinking down the window. (If you are just trying to cut out a well-defined object then the current system is OK.) What I would like is for the GIMP to optionally show the would-be-cropped areas as blocked out. The effect out to be like using cardboard right-angles to try things out before cropping a piece of paper. As a start imagine that everything outside the selected rectangle was just drawn in black. This would help in the situation above, but it might make it a bit hard to adjust the rectangle, because you wouldn't have enough context. Therefore it might be nice if there was a "preview opacity" selection in the Crop tool control box. When this is set to 0%, the behaviour is as it is at present: the to-be-excluded area is shown unobscured. When it's at 100%, the area outside the crop rectangle is drawn in the background color (black, white, checks, whatever.) In between, the background is blended in so that you have some context but it is also easier to see how the picture will look when cropped. Thankyou for your consideration
Created attachment 19972 [details] how it currently looks
Created attachment 19973 [details] what i'd like to see
I drew a little mockup. (I'm bored. :-)
This has been suggested before (first time about five years ago). It's still not implemented though. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 93360 ***