After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 116772 - Problems with integrals and sums
Problems with integrals and sums
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 148362
Product: gpdf
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Martin Kretzschmar
Martin Kretzschmar
: 118721 124269 139734 143096 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-07-05 18:55 UTC by ppletscher
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description ppletscher 2003-07-05 18:55:25 UTC 
Package: gpdf
Severity: normal
Version: 0.103
Synopsis: Problems with integrals and sums
Bugzilla-Product: gpdf
Bugzilla-Component: general

Description:
Description of Problem:
I created a PDF file with some integrals and sums with limits with
LaTex, in xpdf this is shown just perfect, but in gpdf you can see only
the limits, but not the integrals/sums

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. download http://www.galaxysoft.ch/integral.pdf
2. open it
3. 

Actual Results:
no integral is shown

Expected Results:
a integral with limits -infty /+infty

How often does this happen?
always

Additional Information:




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-07-05 14:55 -------

The original reporter (ppletscher@galaxysoft.ch) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, m_kretzschmar@gmx.net.
Comment 1 Martin Kretzschmar 2003-07-31 15:57:07 UTC 
*** Bug 118721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 petrosyan 2003-09-28 21:01:14 UTC 
i can confirm this bug with 
gpdf-0.110-1
it does not show integrals and some other mathematical symbols 
xpdf and acrobat reader show them correctly.
Comment 3 Martin Kretzschmar 2003-12-28 20:01:14 UTC 
The problem with this sample file was fixed in CVS now.

But similar problems still exist, e.g. using glyphs from a Type 1 font
which are not accessible with the font's default encoding, but needed
in the pdf an available via an encoding from the pdf's font dictionary.
Comment 4 Martin Kretzschmar 2003-12-28 20:01:20 UTC 
*** Bug 124269 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Martin Kretzschmar 2004-04-17 18:46:23 UTC 
*** Bug 139734 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Rémi Cohen-Scali 2004-05-25 06:19:03 UTC 
*** Bug 143096 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Hypnos 2004-07-05 20:43:42 UTC 
A sad physicist asks:  What is the status on adding support for enclosed font
dictionaries?  The bug persists with gpdf 0.131.
Comment 8 Martin Kretzschmar 2004-07-24 19:53:49 UTC 
CVS finally contains a fix for these. Where the bug pdf were still downloadable,
I tested them.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 148362 ***