After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 112774 - Crash while left unattended
Crash while left unattended
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 107007
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: panel
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Panel Maintainers
Panel Maintainers
: 113249 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-05-11 17:09 UTC by Martin Ebourne
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Martin Ebourne 2003-05-11 17:09:36 UTC
Package: gnome-panel
Severity: normal
Version: 2.2.0.1
Synopsis: Crash while left unattended
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-panel
Bugzilla-Component: Panel
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1)

Description:
Description of Problem:

Gnome left running with OpenOffice, with one letter open, for a couple
of hours. Crashed while unattended.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?

First time while unattended, but has crashed on me before. (No idea if
it was the same stack trace.)

Additional Information:

Laptop running on mains, with power saving off. Redhat 9.



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-panel'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New
Thread 1086442400 (LWP 1177)]

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0xffffe002
in ??
    ()

Thread 1 (Thread 1086442400 (LWP 1177))

  • #0 ??
  • #1 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 gtk_widget_get_toplevel
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #4 gtk_false
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_get_current_time
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 main
  • #13 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #0 ??




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-05-11 13:09 -------

The original reporter (martin@zepler.org) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, gnome-panel-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2003-05-14 04:42:26 UTC
Appears to be a duplicate of 107007.  The stack trace doesn't look
that useful and I think this may be related to the mysterious gtk+
crash that is showing up everywhere [See specifically bug 105745 for
more info].  If so, we'd really appreciate it if you could get a stack
trace with debugging symbols for us.  Could you do that?

[If you're using RedHat 9, you can do so with the following easy
method; otherwise this will require recompiling from source:
 
  Install
  http://people.redhat.com/otaylor/tmp/gtk2-debuginfo-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm
  and if the problem occurs again, submit the backtrace you get.
  Installing the debuginfo package will make the backtrace much more
  useful.]
                                                                     
          
I am adding myself to the cc and marking as needinfo for now.
Comment 2 Alex Duggan 2003-05-20 03:13:53 UTC
*** Bug 113249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2003-07-07 02:13:41 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 107007 ***