After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 112055 - Balsa randomly crashes
Balsa randomly crashes
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 105745
Product: balsa
Classification: Other
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Balsa Maintainers
Balsa Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-05-02 08:46 UTC by Pierre Prost
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Pierre Prost 2003-05-02 08:46:50 UTC
Package: balsa
Severity: major
Version: 2.0.10
Synopsis: Balsa randomly crashes
Bugzilla-Product: balsa
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1)

Description:
Description of Problem:
Balsa randomly crashes

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Launch Balsa
2. Wait and do something else
3. It crashes...

Actual Results:
Balsa is crashed and all mail status and movements betwenn boxes is
lost

Expected Results:
none

How often does this happen?
At least once a day, sometimes it's worst

Additional Information:
I like Balsa



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/balsa'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New
Thread 16384 (LWP 3290)]
[New Thread 32769 (LWP 3291)]

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
0x41089af9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

Thread 1 (Thread 16384 (LWP 3290))

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 sys_sigabbrev
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #4 __pthread_sighandler
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 sigaction
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 gdk_add_client_message_filter
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_get_current_time
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 main
  • #15 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-05-02 04:46 -------

The original reporter (p.prost@ateme.fr) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, pawsa@theochem.kth.se.

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2003-05-06 20:35:52 UTC
This looks like the mysterious gtk+ crash that is showing up
everywhere [See specifically bug 105745 for more info].

A number of people are getting this, but the stack traces are
unfortunately useless and we don't know how to reproduce the problem.
Can you get a stacktrace with symbols for us?  

[If you're using RedHat 9, you can do so with the following easy
method; otherwise this will require recompiling from source:

  Install
  http://people.redhat.com/otaylor/tmp/gtk2-debuginfo-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm
  and if the problem occurs again, submit the backtrace you get.
  Installing the debuginfo package will make the backtrace much more
  useful.]

I am adding myself to the cc and marking as needinfo for now.
Comment 2 Alex Duggan 2003-07-02 12:43:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 105745 ***