After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 111693 - XChat with gtk+ craches when reconnecting with Remote Desktop
XChat with gtk+ craches when reconnecting with Remote Desktop
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Backend: Win32
2.2.x
Other Windows
: Normal major
: Need diagnosis
Assigned To: gtk-win32 maintainers
gtk-bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-04-27 11:04 UTC by Anders Runeson
Modified: 2010-04-29 10:59 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Anders Runeson 2003-04-27 11:04:50 UTC 
Leaving a messagebox saying:
(process:3568): Gdk-ERROR (recursed) **: file gdkgc-win32.c: line 877
(gdk_win32_hdc_get): assertion failed: (win32_gc->hdc == NULL)
aborting...

When playing with my testbox (running win2003server) to make som
screenshots I got some other errors:
http://kith.no-ip.com/~arune/gtk-gdk-error/
Both occured when connecting with remote desktop (xchat was started when
logged in with RD, but the error occurs when _reconnecting_)


I had no problem with gtk+ v2.0.9.1

/Anders
Comment 1 Javier Jardón (IRC: jjardon) 2010-03-14 16:53:50 UTC 
You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it
recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you.

Can you please check again if the issue you reported here still happens in a
recent GTK+ version and update this report by adding a comment and adjusting
the 'Version' field?

Again thank you for reporting this and sorry that it could not be fixed for the
version you originally used here.

Set to NEEDINFO, so without feedback this report will be closed as INCOMPLETE
after 6 weeks.
Comment 2 Tobias Mueller 2010-04-29 10:59:37 UTC 
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!