After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 111172 - [bme] trash topic?
[bme] trash topic?
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: Bookmarks
3.12.x (obsolete)
Other Windows
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Marco Pesenti Gritti
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-04-19 22:38 UTC by Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail]
Modified: 2015-07-19 02:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Description Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2003-04-19 22:38:16 UTC 
This idea hit me while driving home today. One thing i don't like about 
the current bme ui is that if a user deletes a bm, well there screwed. 
Undo would be helpful, but is probably really hard to do. Another easier 
solution would be to add a "Trash" topic.

Basically any deleted bm would be added to the trash topic, and would not 
appear in any of the other topics or special topics (including all) though 
we may want to persist its properties. 

Anyway its worth thinking about, but can probably be put on the back 
burner.
Comment 1 Marco Pesenti Gritti 2003-04-20 00:34:15 UTC 
I like the idea, we should really really try to keep number of special
topics limited though ;)
Comment 2 Reinout van Schouwen 2004-05-23 22:42:12 UTC 
We should be able to do this without a special topic. 
When deleted, a bookmark could appear in the Trash that we already have on the
desktop. To recover it, the user can drag it back from the trash to the bookmark
editor, or she can activate the url and bookmark it again.
Comment 3 Christian Persch 2004-10-13 10:54:57 UTC 
Mass reassigning of Epiphany bugs to epiphany-maint@b.g.o
Comment 4 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-01-14 00:15:54 UTC 
updating fields.
Comment 5 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-18 20:09:57 UTC 
still valid.
Comment 6 Michael Catanzaro 2015-07-19 02:11:59 UTC 
Let's add the ability to undo deletion instead, bug #110586.