GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 111160
Crash panel
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Package: gnome-panel Severity: normal Version: 2.2.0.1 Synopsis: Crash panel Bugzilla-Product: gnome-panel Bugzilla-Component: Panel BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1) Description: Description of Problem: Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: Expected Results: How often does this happen? 1st time Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-panel' (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1086426016 (LWP 999)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...0xffffe002 in ?? ()
+ Trace 36070
Thread 1 (Thread 1086426016 (LWP 999))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-04-19 14:51 ------- The original reporter (mcross@email.cz) of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Reassigning to the default owner of the component, gnome-panel-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
This looks like the mysterious gtk+ crash that is showing up everywhere [See specifically bug 105745 for more info]. A number of people are getting this, but the stack traces are unfortunately useless and we don't know how to reproduce the problem. Can you get a stacktrace with symbols for us? [If you're using RedHat 9, you can do so with the following easy method; otherwise this will require recompiling from source: Install http://people.redhat.com/otaylor/tmp/gtk2-debuginfo-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm and if the problem occurs again, submit the backtrace you get. Installing the debuginfo package will make the backtrace much more useful.] I am adding myself to the cc and marking as needinfo for now.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 105745 ***