After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 109407 - object class `GnomeProgram' has no property named `default-icon'
object class `GnomeProgram' has no property named `default-icon'
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-python
Classification: Deprecated
Component: gnome
1.99.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Python bindings maintainers
Python bindings maintainers
: 111093 119592 121158 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 117421
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-03-28 13:22 UTC by Stephen Kennedy
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Stephen Kennedy 2003-03-28 13:22:28 UTC 
The following program always gives the above warning.

#! /usr/bin/env python
 
import pygtk
pygtk.require("2.0")
import gnome
import gnome.ui
 
program = gnome.program_init("foo", "1")
app = gnome.ui.App("foo", "1")
Comment 1 James Henstridge 2003-06-18 14:55:34 UTC 
*** Bug 111093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 James Henstridge 2003-06-18 14:57:47 UTC 
I need to trace through exactly what the evil GnomeProgram code is
doing w.r.t. this.  It looks like one of the init functions is not
being called even though we load the module.
Comment 3 James Henstridge 2003-07-22 12:12:24 UTC 
This problem isn't fixable in gnome-python.  To fix it, you will need
a libgnome that contains the fix in bug 117421 (which probably means
2.4 or a 2.2.x maintenance release).
Comment 4 James Henstridge 2003-07-23 13:39:08 UTC 
Since libgnome bug has been closed, which was the culprit, I am going
to mark this bug resolved.

The fix will be included in the next 2.3.x release of libgnome and the
next 2.2 maintenance release.
Comment 5 James Henstridge 2003-08-12 14:07:11 UTC 
*** Bug 119592 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 James Henstridge 2003-09-01 07:21:52 UTC 
*** Bug 121158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***