After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 107319 - Main application window set to bottom of Z order when Servers Dialog closed
Main application window set to bottom of Z order when Servers Dialog closed
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 112404
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Backend: Win32
2.2.x
Other Windows
: Normal normal
: Small fix
Assigned To: gtk-win32 maintainers
gtk-bugs
: 155922 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-03-01 05:31 UTC by Erik Funkenbusch
Modified: 2007-01-08 03:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Erik Funkenbusch 2003-03-01 05:31:39 UTC 
After adding a new server, closing the Servers dialog causes the main 
application window to move to the bottom of the Z Order (behind all other 
apps).

Steps to reproduce:

First, make sure you have several application windows open, and behind 
Pan.

1) Open Servers Dialog

2) Click Add, then click cancel

3) Close the Servers dialog, 

Pan then moves behind all other apps.
Comment 1 Charles Kerr 2003-03-01 11:34:15 UTC 
For the gtk team: the dialog in question is created with

gtk_dialog_new_with_buttons (_("Pan: Servers"),                      
                              
                             parent,                                 
                                           
                             GTK_DIALOG_DESTROY_WITH_PARENT,
                             GTK_STOCK_CLOSE, GTK_RESPONSE_OK,
                             NULL);

and destroyed with gtk_widget_destroy().
Comment 2 Charles Kerr 2003-03-26 19:13:14 UTC 
Reassigning to the owner of the gtk win32 component
Comment 3 Owen Taylor 2003-06-05 18:00:11 UTC 
*** Bug 112404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Hans Breuer 2004-11-27 01:11:40 UTC 
*** Bug 155922 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Tor Lillqvist 2007-01-08 03:18:25 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112404 ***