After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 106244 - Gedit crashes on exit
Gedit crashes on exit
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 100709
Product: gedit
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Gedit maintainers
gedit QA volunteers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-02-16 19:18 UTC by terminus
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description terminus 2003-02-16 19:14:02 UTC
Package: gedit
Severity: critical
Version: GNOME2.2.0 2.2.0.1
os_details: Gnome.Org
Synopsis: Gedit crashes on exit
Bugzilla-Product: gedit
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1)
Description:
Description of Problem:
Gedit works normally (with/without plugins) but as soon as you exit, it
crashes.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Open Gedit
2. Close it
3. It crashes

Actual Results:
gedit coredumps on exit.

Expected Results:
gedit coredumps/crashes on exit

How often does this happen?
Always

Additional Information:
Tried recompiling several times, still no luck.


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/X11R6/bin/gedit'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
0x28f8dcb8 in __sys_poll () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4

Thread 1 (process 96467, thread 1)

  • #0 __sys_poll
    from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4
  • #1 _thread_kern_sched_state_unlock
    from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4
  • #2 _thread_kern_scheduler
    from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4
#3  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-02-16 14:14 -------

The original reporter (terminus@qubix.ca) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, maggi@athena.polito.it.

Comment 1 Deborah Newren 2003-02-17 02:40:01 UTC
It looks like the stack trace was truncated.  Can you submit a
complete stack trace?  (Please see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/getting-traces.cgi for more information on
how to do this.)
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2003-03-04 22:54:27 UTC
I apologize for the spam, but in talking to David Kennedy on #bugs we decided
that it might be useful for me to add a comment to a lot of bugs that have
nearly identical stack traces that aren't very useful.  (It took me a while
because I gave up on several bugzilla queries that simply hung).  Anyway, I may
have caught some bugs with this query that aren't relevant, so I apologize again
if this bug is one of those.  If not:

The following comment from 100709 may be relevant: "It turns out this was an
accidental FreeBSD ABI change during the import of gcc-3.2.1. div(), a structure
returning function, was the culprit."
Comment 3 Andrew Sobala 2003-03-05 14:34:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 100709 ***