After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 105136 - All binaries corrupt
All binaries corrupt
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 105611
Product: Pan
Classification: Other
Component: general
pre-0.13.4 betas
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: 0.13.4
Assigned To: Charles Kerr
Pan QA Team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-02-03 16:29 UTC by bloch
Modified: 2006-06-18 05:22 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description bloch 2003-02-03 16:29:37 UTC 
Since upgrading to the latest beta version (actually 0.13.3.91) all
binaries I've downloaded have been corrupt.

There aren't any messages indicating a problem in the run log.

I'll look into this further tonight.
Comment 1 Charles Kerr 2003-02-03 17:08:19 UTC 
I'm not seeing this at all.

Any console warnings?
Comment 2 bloch 2003-02-03 17:12:11 UTC 
No, nothing at all.

Even the "corrupt image header" warning has gone...

I'll ask someone who uses the same server to d/l some stuff to make
sure it's not a problem there.
Comment 3 bloch 2003-02-03 20:28:16 UTC 
Can I change my story - now I'm back home there are "Checksum
failed....may be corrupt" messages on the console.
Comment 4 bloch 2003-02-03 22:45:55 UTC 
Now confirmed that a posting downloaded with 0.13.3.90 works whereas one 
downloaded with 0.13.3.91 is corrupt.
Comment 5 Charles Kerr 2003-02-03 23:43:53 UTC 
Let me work a couple of different angles here...

1. yenc and uu, or just yenc?

2. singlepart and multipart, or just multipart?

3. could you diff .msg files downloaded from .90 and .91
   so that we can see what the differences are?

4. just to confirm, no console messages at all regarding
   socket connections, talking about buffering or encoding?

5. what platform are you using, and what version of gnet?

cheers,
Charles
Comment 6 bloch 2003-02-04 00:54:05 UTC 
Can't answer all the questions yet:

Only multipart, so far.

None of the console messages you mention.

Red Hat 7.3, Ximian, gnet 1.1.8 (RPM from gnet site)

I'll have another look tomorrow night.
Comment 7 Charles Kerr 2003-02-09 00:43:16 UTC 
Adam: ping
Comment 8 Charles Kerr 2003-02-10 16:56:56 UTC 
Adam: I'm marking this as a duplicate of 105611.
Please read my Additional Comments there and let
me know what you think.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 105611 ***