After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 104253 - Gnome session crashed
Gnome session crashed
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 105745
Product: gnome-session
Classification: Core
Component: gnome-session
unspecified
Other other
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Session Maintainers
Session Maintainers
: 111782 111908 111918 112206 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-01-23 17:47 UTC by shaihulud
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description shaihulud 2003-01-23 17:44:49 UTC
Package: gnome-session
Severity: normal
Version: 2.1.90
Synopsis: Gnome session crashed
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-session
Bugzilla-Component: gnome-session
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.1.90)

Description:
Description of Problem:
Gnome-session has crashed in a normal session, there wasn't anything of
strange in the desktop using.




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-session'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1086040960 (LWP 5698)]
0xffffe002 in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread 1086040960 (LWP 5698))

  • #0 ??
  • #1 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 gdk_event_get_graphics_expose
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #4 gdk_add_client_message_filter
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_get_current_time
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 main
  • #13 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #0 ??




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-01-23 12:44 -------

The original reporter (shaihulud@supereva.it) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, gnome-session-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 John Fleck 2003-01-25 02:33:16 UTC
Note that bug 104263 looks an awful lot like this one.
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2003-05-01 18:31:30 UTC
*** Bug 111908 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2003-05-01 18:33:40 UTC
This looks the same as bug 105745 (the stack trace of the main thread
is identical).
Comment 4 John Fleck 2003-05-04 14:00:45 UTC
*** Bug 112206 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 John Fleck 2003-05-04 14:01:42 UTC
*** Bug 111782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 John Fleck 2003-05-04 14:02:09 UTC
*** Bug 111918 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Elijah Newren 2003-05-06 20:38:18 UTC
This looks like the mysterious gtk+ crash that is showing up
everywhere [See specifically bug 105745 for more info].

A number of people are getting this, but the stack traces are
unfortunately useless and we don't know how to reproduce the problem.
Can you get a stacktrace with symbols for us?

[If you're using RedHat 9, you can do so with the following easy
method; otherwise this will require recompiling from source:

  Install
  http://people.redhat.com/otaylor/tmp/gtk2-debuginfo-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm
  and if the problem occurs again, submit the backtrace you get.
  Installing the debuginfo package will make the backtrace much more
  useful.]

I am adding myself to the cc and marking as needinfo for now.
Comment 8 Alex Duggan 2003-07-02 12:41:46 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 105745 ***