After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 103765 - Gnome terminal crashes on resize
Gnome terminal crashes on resize
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 94735
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.0.x
Other Windows
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Havoc Pennington
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-01-17 18:41 UTC by Nathan
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0



Description Nathan 2003-01-17 18:41:33 UTC
I started a gnome-terminal, SSH'ed to another box. I was reading man 
pages, then tried to resize (larger) the terminal and it crashed.  This 
problem is repeatable.
Comment 1 Alex Duggan 2003-01-17 21:14:51 UTC
Please include a backtrace of the crash using bug-buddy or gdb.  See
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/getting-traces.cgi for more information. 
Thanks.
Comment 2 kdd 2003-02-04 19:24:51 UTC
** ERROR **: NULL at 30(->1) delta 32, length 27, max 29 next 59 at 2376
Comment 3 kdd 2003-02-04 19:44:45 UTC
(sorry incomplete - output to  standard error).   I have the same
crash behavior on resizing for ssh, occasionally rsh.  

gdb output:
** ERROR **: NULL at 111(->55) delta 129, length 38, max 56 next 167
at 2376

aborting...

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.

Thread 8192 (LWP 3189)

  • #0 kill
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #1 raise
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 abort
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #3 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 vte_terminal_ensure_cursor
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.2
  • #6 vte_sequence_handler_ce
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.2
  • #7 vte_terminal_handle_sequence
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.2
  • #8 vte_terminal_process_incoming
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.2
  • #9 g_idle_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_main_context_iterate
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 main
  • #16 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6

I can not reproduce this on a friend's vanilla RH8.0, so I suspect a
LANG or font change  is behind it.
Comment 4 Nathan 2003-02-04 20:58:34 UTC
This time I SSH'ed to another box, executed the command "ls -al |
less" while it was still pageing, I resized the window. Here are the
results: 

(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/gnome-terminal 
[New Thread 8192 (LWP 1354)]

** ERROR **: NULL at 18(->18) delta 21, length 29, max 32 next 50 at 2376

aborting...

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 8192 (LWP 1354)]
0x42028cc1 in kill () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
(gdb) thread apply all bt

Thread 1 (Thread 8192 (LWP 1354))

  • #0 kill
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #1 raise
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 abort
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #3 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 vte_terminal_ensure_cursor
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.2
  • #6 vte_sequence_handler_ce
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.2
  • #7 vte_terminal_handle_sequence
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.2
  • #8 vte_terminal_process_incoming
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.2
  • #9 g_idle_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_main_context_iterate
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 main
  • #16 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6

Comment 5 Alex Duggan 2003-02-05 03:29:40 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 94735 ***