After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 103235 - Nautilus crashes, when folders/progams/icons should be moved
Nautilus crashes, when folders/progams/icons should be moved
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 102811
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Desktop
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-01-13 00:32 UTC by Goran Ristic
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0


Attachments
debug output from crash; from bug-buddy (10.06 KB, text/plain)
2003-01-13 01:07 UTC, Goran Ristic
Details

Description Goran Ristic 2003-01-13 00:32:49 UTC
Description of Problem:
When trying to sort Icons on the Desktop, I can
drag and drop one. It does not move. Klicking
another icon after it, nautilus crashes. Though,
the icon is moved afterwards.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. drag and drop any icon somewhere
2. try to drag and drop another icon
3. 

Actual Results:
Nautilus restarts; has moved icon to desired place

Expected Results:
should move immediately; without crashing. ;)

How often does this happen? 
Allways

Additional Information:
none
Comment 1 Alex Duggan 2003-01-13 00:36:14 UTC
Please include a backtrace of the crash using bug-buddy or gdb.  See
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/getting-traces.cgi for more information. 
Thanks.
Comment 2 Goran Ristic 2003-01-13 01:07:18 UTC
Created attachment 13515 [details]
debug output from crash; from bug-buddy
Comment 3 thomas.kulessa 2003-01-21 11:39:12 UTC
Don't know if it is the same bug, but each try to move an icon on the
desktop or inside a nautilus window causes nautilus to crash. 
This happens on two different systems running Debian testing/unstable.
In the past there was no such error, only since the update of some
packages. I don' t know which package exatcly caused this bug, perhaps
(gtk+2.2.0???).
Comment 4 Elijah Newren 2003-02-15 06:06:47 UTC
The stack trace looks familar.  I'm pasting it inline so that it can
be searched easier...

0x40b23a39 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

Thread 4 (Thread 32771 (LWP 23887))

  • #0 sigsuspend
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 pthread_cond_wait
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_vfs_thread_pool_init
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #4 gnome_vfs_thread_pool_init
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #5 g_static_private_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 pthread_start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 3 (Thread 16386 (LWP 23886))

  • #0 sigsuspend
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 pthread_cond_wait
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_vfs_thread_pool_init
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #4 gnome_vfs_thread_pool_init
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #5 g_static_private_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 pthread_start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 16384 (LWP 23884))

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 sys_sigabbrev
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #4 __pthread_sighandler
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 sigaction
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 raise
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #7 abort
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #8 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gnome_canvas_request_redraw_uta
    from /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0
  • #11 gnome_canvas_request_redraw
    from /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0
  • #12 gnome_canvas_item_new
    from /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0
  • #13 gnome_canvas_item_new
    from /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0
  • #14 nautilus_icon_container_move_icon
    from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
  • #15 nautilus_icon_container_move_icon
    from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
  • #16 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_cclosure_new_swap
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_widget_send_expose
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_get_current_time
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #31 main
  • #32 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6

Comment 5 Elijah Newren 2003-02-15 06:10:43 UTC
Looks like a duplicate of bug 102907, which is marked as a duplicate
of 102811.

thomas.kulessa@epost.de: I don't know if this is the same bug as you
are experiencing or not, though I suspect it is.  I've seen several
crashes with similar stack traces to the one shown in this bug, all
coming from debian testing/unstable.  It seems that the Debian
packages were temporarily broken (or just included a version that not
many other people used).  Bug 102811 may contain more information.  If
you'd really like to know if this is the same bug, please file another
bug report with a stack trace.

I'm going to reopen this so I can mark it as a duplicate.
Comment 6 Elijah Newren 2003-02-15 06:11:02 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 102811 ***