GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 100460
Gedit crashes when ran
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Package: gedit Severity: normal Version: 2.0.2 Synopsis: Gedit crashes when ran Bugzilla-Product: gedit Bugzilla-Component: general BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.3) Description: Description of Problem: Gedit seems to be crashing after computer has been running so many days. Usually gedit crashes after the computer has been running for least 2 days. I get an additional error with the crash error. The other one states that an error occurred while loading or saving configuration information. Maybe this is a Gconf problem? Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Have computer run least 2 days 2. Run Gedit, does always work right away. Seems to be random 3. Actual Results: Expected Results: How often does this happen? Additional Information: This never happened when I was using the lastest Gnome from gnome.org while I was still using Red Hat Linux 7.3. This problem started when I installed Red Hat Linux 8.0. I don't know if that has anything to do with it, but you never know. Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gedit' (no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 8192 (LWP 2319)] 0x420ae169 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
+ Trace 31370
Thread 1 (Thread 8192 (LWP 2319))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-12-05 15:32 ------- The original reporter (pvinson@fit.edu) of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Reassigning to the default owner of the component, maggi@athena.polito.it.
Interesting. Only one other person has reported a problem with a similar stack trace. From your description, I'd take a wild guess and say that a memory leak in another program has eaten up all memory and prevents gedit from running. Just a wild guess, though. Can you try running gnome-system-monitor when you get the crash to see if this might be the case? Also, please add any extra comments to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95063 Thanks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 95063 ***