After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 100372 - error in one of the borders
error in one of the borders
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 347013
Product: Gnumeric
Classification: Applications
Component: import/export HTML
git master
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Jody Goldberg
Jody Goldberg
Depends on:
Reported: 2002-12-04 21:34 UTC by Adrian Custer
Modified: 2010-07-19 07:32 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Honour visibility (1.77 KB, patch)
2004-04-02 05:19 UTC, Jody Goldberg
needs-work Details | Review

Description Adrian Custer 2002-12-04 21:34:17 UTC

Comment 1 Adrian Custer 2002-12-04 21:44:05 UTC
sorry about that, <return> seems to submit the bug with the new galeon
     (with much trepedation I will try <return> again. Oh, no. cut and
paste will work... 

The LaTex exporter does something weird with merged cells when the
cell which
is hidden has a border.
1) new gnumeric
2) B2 gets a
3) F2 gets a
4) put a thick border around each cell in B2 to F2
==> if you export to LaTeX, all is well
5) merge B2 to E2
==> if you export to LaTeX, all is well
6) F4 gets a
==> if you export to LaTeX, we are picking up the hidden merged border
so the border in latex is generating :t: and :b: (small openings in
the double line) which should not be there. The value being generated
should be =. Of course, these are all numeric place holders. We need
the c code not to look at borders when in the middle of a merged region.
and sorry again about the blank email,
Comment 2 Jody Goldberg 2004-04-02 05:19:43 UTC
Created attachment 26230 [details] [review]
Honour visibility

this patch against head should do the trick.  It may be possible to backport it
to 1.2.x too (that code has not changed much)
Comment 3 Jody Goldberg 2004-04-02 05:20:27 UTC
Andreas does that seem reasonable to you ?
Comment 4 Andreas J. Guelzow 2004-05-11 15:05:44 UTC
This patch causes bug #142219 I have undone its commit.
Comment 5 Andreas J. Guelzow 2010-07-19 07:32:27 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 347013 ***