After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 100263 - nautilus 2.0.6 crash [gdk_event_translate(), _gdk_events_queue()]
nautilus 2.0.6 crash [gdk_event_translate(), _gdk_events_queue()]
Status: VERIFIED INCOMPLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.0.x
Other other
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 104547 108669 135613 152823 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-12-03 19:48 UTC by Ted Kaczmarek
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0


Description Ted Kaczmarek 2002-12-03 19:50:35 UTC 
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.6
Synopsis: crashed after trying to open home dir
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.3)

Description:
Description of Problem: Nautililus was hung trying to open home
directory.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1.Click on home desktop icon
2. Nautlilus hangs tryting view contents
3. ignore and preceed to do other stuff, it eventually crashes

Actual Results:Nautilus crashes

Expected Results:Nautilus shows view of contents of home dir.



How often does this happen?Once so far


Additional Information: Redhat 8.0, laptop, wireless and have some
ximian stuff from the evolution channel. 




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 8192 (LWP 1156)]
[New Thread 16385 (LWP 1164)]
[New Thread 8194 (LWP 1165)]
[New Thread 16387 (LWP 1166)]
[New Thread 24580 (LWP 1167)]
[New Thread 32773 (LWP 1830)]
0x420ae169 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6

+ Trace 31250

Thread 1 (Thread 8192 (LWP 1156))

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #1 __DTOR_END__
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #4 __pthread_sighandler
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 ??
  • #7 gdk_event_translate
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gdk_event_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_main_context_iterate
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 main
  • #16 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-12-03 14:50 -------

Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2002-12-04 02:42:26 UTC 
Hmmm.  When I ran a bugzilla query on nautilus with five of the
functions in your stack trace, the closest thing I could find was bug
82885.  But that would have to assume that your stack trace cut out
lots of functions right at level 6.  Can you duplicate this?  If so,
please try using gdb to attach to the process and see if it can obtain
a better stacktrace.

nautilus people: Is this stack trace useful enough as it is?

I'm going to set severity->critical (it's a crasher), set version to
2.0.x, set OS Details to Redhat 8.0, mark as new, and set the
GNOMEVER2.0 and bugsquad keywords.
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2003-01-27 21:36:44 UTC 
*** Bug 104547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2003-03-18 16:16:54 UTC 
*** Bug 108669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Elijah Newren 2003-07-20 00:47:59 UTC 
No duplicates yet found in GNOME 2.2.  I'm going to mark as needinfo
for now, and close later if no one can reproduce in GNOME version >= 2.2.
Comment 5 mwehner 2003-10-16 14:35:12 UTC 
No duplicates in later versions so far, closing.
Comment 6 Matthew Gatto 2004-03-04 14:50:30 UTC 
changing Summary to make searching easier.
Comment 7 Matthew Gatto 2004-03-04 14:51:46 UTC 
*** Bug 135613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Martin Wehner 2004-09-16 17:17:42 UTC 
*** Bug 152823 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***