After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 720636 - No reviews since some weeks ?
No reviews since some weeks ?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: website
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: extensions.gnome.org
current
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Shell extensions maintainer(s)
Shell extensions maintainer(s)
: 720973 736674 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-12-17 20:44 UTC by jens
Modified: 2018-02-01 00:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description jens 2013-12-17 20:44:22 UTC
I uploaded a fork of the weather-extension (openweather, which uses openweathermap.org).
It waits for review for far more than a month now.

It looks like no reviews have been made for (at least) this time and the list of the unreviewed extensions grows.

Are there any problems with extensions.gnome.org, or do you just don't have time to do the reviews.
Some reviews make extensions available for gnome 3.10, but did not make it into the repo (at least not in the reviewed part of it).
Today Fedora switched to release 20, which ships with gnome-shell 3.10 and several extensions will just not be usable any more, not really good in my opinion.
Comment 1 drago01 2013-12-17 23:48:03 UTC
Thanks for the "ping" I don't know about the others but I am currently pretty busy (don't have time to work on core stuff either or review patches there) ... I have reviewed and approved a few extensions today. But the queue has over 100 extension so it will take some time until they get reviewed. 

We need more reviewers.
Comment 2 jens 2013-12-18 05:36:33 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> We need more reviewers.

I would really like to help, but I'm not very familiar with gnome(-shell) internals.
And we are short before next release (this month) with Code::Blocks (http://www.codeblocks.org/), and because I'm not only developer and one of the forum admins there, but also packager for our own Fedora, Debian and Cent/OS/RedHat packages, I'm quite busy there from time to time (additional to family and work of course).

The only thing I could do is test extensions on different versions of gnome-shell (3.6, 3.8 and 3.10 currently) on my Fedora systems (real and vm) and look for crashes and suspicious output in systemlog.

I could also look for style-guide issues, but I'm not even sure if I did all correct in my extension (https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/750/openweather/), because it's not reviewed and therefore I did not get any feedback (except from some users).
It's the first I ever really worked on and that was just because the older weather-extension has switched to use gweather and is unusable for a many user, because many cities can no longer be found (including mine).
The problem is, that new extensions (or forks), like mine, are not seen by other users.
The only way to "promote" it, is to link to my github-page in the comments of Neroth's weather-extension, but this is something I really don't like to do (even if I did this already as you can see in the comments of https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/613/weather/).
Comment 3 André Klapper 2013-12-23 16:05:30 UTC
*** Bug 720973 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Florian Miess 2014-02-25 10:25:15 UTC
Hi.
I just want to "ping" this once again:
There's a growing list of unreviewed extensions.
Comment 5 André Klapper 2014-09-15 20:35:29 UTC
*** Bug 736674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Alexandre Franke 2015-07-02 17:51:37 UTC
Even though reviewers are still needed, it seems the current queue is empty, so this is not relevant anymore.
Comment 7 Alexandre Singh 2018-02-01 00:08:47 UTC
Hello, pending reviews' list is huge since several weeks.

A lot of extensions are in waiting queue, including simple updates. Look at one of the most popular, "dash-to-dock", version 62 still isn't available if we don't build it from GitHub directly. 

If more reviewers are needed I'd be glad to help of course.