After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 710595 - "Details" panel has a button for updating the system which still tries to run gpk-update-viewer
"Details" panel has a button for updating the system which still tries to run...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: Other Preferences
3.10.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
: 720803 720866 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-10-21 23:15 UTC by Adam Williamson
Modified: 2013-12-24 14:07 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Adam Williamson 2013-10-21 23:15:38 UTC
As of GNOME 3.10.1 / Fedora 20 it seems like we're trying to rationalize everything to do updates via systemd offline update and use GNOME Software for packaging stuff. One of our Fedora QA folks (satellit) has found one that slipped under the radar, I think.

If you go into Control Center and click 'Details', there's a button at bottom left which lets you update the system, if it thinks updates are available. I think this is still hooked up to run gpk-update-viewer, which won't work in Fedora at least since https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18952/gnome-packagekit-3.10.0-2.fc20 . According to satellit, the button 'used to work' around F20 Beta TC2 but no longer does, which fits the timeframe.

This should probably get hooked into offline updates, I guess.
Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2013-10-22 12:28:13 UTC
commit 33cc59d726225f77b91de96d17707b5384134580
Author: Richard Hughes <richard@hughsie.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 22 13:12:11 2013 +0100

    info: Use gnome-software for showing the list of updates if installed
    
    Resolves: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710595

This will be in the 3.10.2 update.
Comment 2 Michael Catanzaro 2013-12-21 16:15:16 UTC
*** Bug 720803 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Michael Catanzaro 2013-12-21 22:49:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> 
> This will be in the 3.10.2 update.

This fix got lost; it will instead be in 3.10.3.
Comment 4 Richard Hughes 2013-12-24 14:07:55 UTC
*** Bug 720866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***