GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 659969
Please add translator comment for "looking glass dialog"
Last modified: 2015-07-26 11:25:58 UTC
#: ../data/org.gnome.shell.gschema.xml.in.h:7 msgid "History for the looking glass dialog" What is looking glass dialog. Please add translation comment
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/LookingGlass
Please use descriptive descriptions and please ALWAYS provide a link for developers describing what translation comments are. https://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/DevGuidelines/Use%20comments
Created attachment 307452 [details] [review] Add translator comment Explain what looking glass is.
Review of attachment 307452 [details] [review]: just a nit pick below, fine either way ::: data/org.gnome.shell.gschema.xml.in.in @@ +51,3 @@ </key> <key name="looking-glass-history" type="as"> + <default><!-- Translators: looking glass is a debugger and inspector tool, see https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/LookingGlass -->[]</default> Can you put this in its own line like: <default>.. <!-- Translators... --> <_summary>..
Created attachment 307461 [details] [review] Add translator comment
Attachment 307461 [details] pushed as eaa3f83 - Add translator comment
(In reply to Alexandre Franke from comment #6) > Created attachment 307461 [details] [review] [review] > Add translator comment This doesn't work. You need to make it like Rui suggested to appear in the PO files.
I don't get the difference. Can you fix it?
Sure, there you go: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/commit/?id=f2a9c55637758a7c995edc1775494b2a66001fb3
Ah! But https://wiki.gnome.org/TranslationProject/DevGuidelines/Use%20comments states that comments "need to be inside <default>, <short> or <long> elements"!
(In reply to Alexandre Franke from comment #11) > Ah! But > https://wiki.gnome.org/TranslationProject/DevGuidelines/Use%20comments > states that comments "need to be inside <default>, <short> or <long> > elements"! Looks like it worked nevertheless, looking at https://l10n.gnome.org/POT/gnome-shell.master/gnome-shell.master.cs.po Anybody up to updating the docs?