Bug 482748 – crash in Tasks: * I don't know; I didn't...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 482748 - crash in Tasks: * I don't know; I didn't...


Summary:	crash in Tasks: * I don't know; I didn't...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 426807

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Tasks
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-10-02 21:33 UTC by bogdan_ghervan
Modified:	2007-10-07 14:58 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description bogdan_ghervan 2007-10-02 21:33:15 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
* I don't know; I didn't even see it running


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 138551296 vsize: 138551296 resident: 41984000 share: 19853312 rss: 41984000 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1191348883 rtime: 3148 utime: 2833 stime: 315 cutime:69 cstime: 22 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208396064 (LWP 5433)]
[New Thread -1346819184 (LWP 8185)]
[New Thread -1367798896 (LWP 8184)]
[New Thread -1226876016 (LWP 5497)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00387402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 167246

Thread 1 (Thread -1208396064 (LWP 5433))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_slist_free
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 pango_layout_line_unref
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#12 ??
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#13 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0
#23 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#26 gnome_icon_list_clear
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#28 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libemiscwidgets.so.0
#29 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#32 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#33 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#34 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#36 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#37 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#38 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#39 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#40 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#41 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#42 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#43 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#44 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#45 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#46 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#47 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#48 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#49 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#50 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#51 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#52 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#53 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#54 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#55 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#56 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#57 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#58 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#59 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#60 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#61 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#62 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#63 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#64 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#65 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#66 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#67 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#68 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#69 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#70 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#71 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#72 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#73 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#74 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#75 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#76 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#77 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#78 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#79 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#80 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#81 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#82 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#83 g_value_unset
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#84 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#85 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#86 gtk_container_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#87 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#88 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#89 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#90 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#91 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#92 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#93 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#94 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#95 html_engine_parse
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#96 gtk_html_begin_full
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#97 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#98 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#99 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#100 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#101 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#102 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#103 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#104 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall



----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
(evolution:5433): e-utils-WARNING **: Cannot resolve symbol 'org_gnome_new_mail_config' in plugin '/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-new-mail-notify.so' (not exported?)
BBDB spinning up...
(evolution:5433): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa999010'
(evolution:5433): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa999130'
(evolution:5433): e-data-server-ui-DEBUG: ep_msg_send: in main thread? 0
(evolution:5433): e-data-server-ui-DEBUG: ep_msg_send: in main thread? 0
--- Hash table keys for warning below:
--> file:///home/bogdan
(nautilus:8157): Eel-WARNING **: "nautilus-directory.c: directories" hash table still has 1 element at quit time (keys above)
Window manager warning: Invalid WM_TRANSIENT_FOR window 0x4600003 specified for 0x4605663 (Choose Fil).
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Suman Manjunath 2007-10-07 14:58:35 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 426807 ***