Bug 472543 – crash in Open Folder: opening smb server folde...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 472543 - crash in Open Folder: opening smb server folde...


Summary:	crash in Open Folder: opening smb server folde...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 433983

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.18.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-09-01 14:17 UTC by olefasting
Modified:	2007-09-11 13:43 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description olefasting 2007-09-01 14:17:53 UTC

Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
opening smb server folder


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.4-65.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Aug 21 22:36:56 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 130179072 vsize: 130179072 resident: 74113024 share: 36237312 rss: 74113024 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1188587839 rtime: 106360 utime: 83224 stime: 23136 cutime:0 cstime: 10 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209067808 (LWP 2564)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0012d402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 159628

Thread 1 (Thread -1209067808 (LWP 2564))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/libc.so.6
#7 g_logv
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_log
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_assert_warning
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
#11 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_tree_row_reference_free
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 ??
#22 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#23 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#24 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#25 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall



----------- .xsession-errors (60818 sec old) ---------------------
(gnome-background-properties:23304): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed
(gnome-background-properties:23304): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed
(gnome-background-properties:23304): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `src != NULL' failed
(gnome-background-properties:23304): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed
(gnome-background-properties:23304): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed
(gnome-background-properties:23304): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `src != NULL' failed
(gnome-background-properties:23304): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `p
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-09-11 13:43:11 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433983 ***