After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 449429 - crash in Open Folder: I was installing java on...
crash in Open Folder: I was installing java on...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 433983
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-20 11:02 UTC by viswarup_chakravorty
Modified: 2007-06-23 21:57 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18


Description viswarup_chakravorty 2007-06-20 11:02:27 UTC 
Version: 2.18.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I was installing java on this system.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 163672064 vsize: 163672064 resident: 40902656 share: 20377600 rss: 40902656 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1182332589 rtime: 2225 utime: 1710 stime: 515 cutime:1336 cstime: 300 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208723744 (LWP 2635)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00319402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 142386

Thread 1 (Thread -1208723744 (LWP 2635))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_assert_warning
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
  • #11 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 gtk_tree_row_reference_free
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #30 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libgcc_s.so.1" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libhal.so.1" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgstpbutils-0.10.so.0" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-06-23 21:57:06 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433983 ***