Bug 443410 – crash in svg gdk-pixbuf-loader

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 443410 - crash in svg gdk-pixbuf-loader


Summary:	crash in svg gdk-pixbuf-loader


Status:	RESOLVED OBSOLETE

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	general
Version:	2.10.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:	aklapper[fc7]

Duplicates:	446548 449029 450740 451555 454451 456219 456482 459887 461514 465585 475268 475653 476022 476660 478849 480519 482006 482307 487668 489304 493378 506894 509251 510923 512266 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-06-03 02:34 UTC by n1kx
Modified:	2008-07-07 16:04 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description n1kx 2007-06-03 02:34:21 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Trying to create a rule based on sender in Evolution.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:47:07 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 673173504 vsize: 673173504 resident: 50941952 share: 23842816 rss: 50941952 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1180837273 rtime: 1064 utime: 998 stime: 66 cutime:25 cstime: 10 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912739572512 (LWP 5082)]
[New Thread 1094719824 (LWP 5253)]
[New Thread 1115699536 (LWP 5166)]
[New Thread 1126455632 (LWP 5125)]
[New Thread 1084229968 (LWP 5096)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002aaaad8bf89f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 137677

Thread 1 (Thread 46912739572512 (LWP 5082))

#0 waitpid
from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 <signal handler called>
#3 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#5 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 g_slice_free1
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 g_ptr_array_free
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 ??
from /usr/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#9 ??
from /usr/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#10 ??
from /usr/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#11 ??
from /usr/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#12 g_object_unref
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/svg_loader.so
#14 gdk_pixbuf_loader_close
from /usr/lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_icon_info_load_icon
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_icon_theme_load_icon
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 g_closure_invoke
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_signal_emit
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_widget_realize
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 g_closure_invoke
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 ??
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_signal_emit
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_widget_show
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 filter_gui_add_from_message
from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#33 ??
from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#34 ??
from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#35 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#37 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#38 g_main_loop_run
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#39 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib64/libbonobo-2.so.0
#40 main
#0 waitpid
from /lib64/libpthread.so.0



----------- .xsession-errors (8 sec old) ---------------------
  Major opcode:  157
  Minor opcode:  6
  Resource id:  0x64
X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3
  Major opcode:  19
  Minor opcode:  0
  Resource id:  0x161e703
X Error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) 4
  Major opcode:  54
  Minor opcode:  0
  Resource id:  0x1401a88
X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8
  Major opcode:  157
  Minor opcode:  6
  Resource id:  0x64
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-06-03 10:57:20 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot
to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.
Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see
http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.
Thanks in advance!

Comment 2 palfrey 2007-06-12 16:03:49 UTC

*** Bug 446548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 palfrey 2007-06-25 00:18:46 UTC

*** Bug 450740 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 palfrey 2007-06-27 13:33:37 UTC

*** Bug 451555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 palfrey 2007-07-07 21:24:34 UTC

*** Bug 454451 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 André Klapper 2007-07-29 13:00:26 UTC

*** Bug 459887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 André Klapper 2007-07-29 13:00:26 UTC

*** Bug 456219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 André Klapper 2007-07-29 13:02:24 UTC

*** Bug 449029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 André Klapper 2007-07-29 13:27:58 UTC

*** Bug 456482 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 André Klapper 2007-07-29 13:32:02 UTC

trace from bug 456482:

+ Trace 151357

#2 <signal handler called>
#3 slab_allocator_free_chunk
at gslice.c line 1021
#4 magazine_cache_push_magazine
at gslice.c line 567
#5 thread_memory_magazine2_unload
at gslice.c line 697
#6 IA__g_slice_free1
at gslice.c line 806
#7 IA__g_ptr_array_free
at garray.c line 400
#8 _rsvg_node_finalize
at rsvg-structure.c line 114
#9 _rsvg_node_free
at rsvg-structure.c line 123
#10 rsvg_defs_free
at rsvg-defs.c line 177
#11 instance_dispose
at rsvg-gobject.c line 98
#12 IA__g_object_unref
at gobject.c line 1760
#13 gdk_pixbuf__svg_image_stop_load
at io-svg.c line 166
#14 IA__gdk_pixbuf_loader_close
at gdk-pixbuf-loader.c line 715
#15 icon_info_ensure_scale_and_pixbuf
at gtkicontheme.c line 2595
#16 IA__gtk_icon_info_load_icon
at gtkicontheme.c line 2756
#17 IA__gtk_icon_theme_load_icon
at gtkicontheme.c line 1414
#18 icon_list_from_theme
at gtkwindow.c line 2778
#19 gtk_window_realize_icon
at gtkwindow.c line 2851
#20 gtk_window_realize
at gtkwindow.c line 4383
#21 IA__g_closure_invoke
at gclosure.c line 490
#22 signal_emit_unlocked_R
at gsignal.c line 2370
#23 IA__g_signal_emit_valist
at gsignal.c line 2199
#24 IA__g_signal_emit
at gsignal.c line 2243
#25 IA__gtk_widget_realize
at gtkwidget.c line 2498



probably a fedora7 gtk+ issue, reported downstream as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250014

Comment 11 Susana 2007-07-29 22:44:28 UTC

*** Bug 461514 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 André Klapper 2007-08-03 17:47:19 UTC

dear reporters, can you please tell us which versions of gtk+ and evolution you are *exactly* using? to get this information, just open a gnome terminal window (applications -> system tools -> terminal), enter "rpm -q evolution" and "rpm -q gtk2", and post the output here as a new comment.

thanks a lot in advance for your help getting this fixed!

Comment 13 Allan Engelhardt 2007-08-05 09:04:50 UTC

As mentioned on Bug 456482 :

I do not think the problem has gone away, but formally the version is whatever was current in the Fedora 7 repositories at the time I reported the bug.  Looking through my yum log files that would seem to have been

evolution.x86_64 2.10.3-1.fc7 (updated 8 July)
gtk2.x86_64 2.10.13-1.fc7 (updated 20 June)
gtk+.x86_64 1.2.10-57.fc7 (7 June)

Current versions are:

evolution-2.10.3-2.fc7
gtk2-2.10.14-3.fc7
gtk+-1.2.10-57.fc7 (only this one is the same as above)


Allan.

Comment 14 Allan Engelhardt 2007-08-05 09:16:15 UTC

Attempting to reproduce the bug (following the Bug 456482 recipe) with the current versions shown in Comment 13 gave an instance of Bug 445445 (which does not leave a stack trace).

[Downstream ticket has been updated.]

Comment 15 Susana 2007-10-06 12:31:05 UTC

*** Bug 465585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 16 Susana 2007-10-06 12:31:07 UTC

*** Bug 475268 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 Susana 2007-10-06 12:31:13 UTC

*** Bug 475653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 18 Susana 2007-10-06 12:31:14 UTC

*** Bug 476022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 19 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-24 05:32:13 UTC

*** Bug 489304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 20 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-24 05:33:07 UTC

*** Bug 482307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 21 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-24 05:33:26 UTC

*** Bug 482006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 22 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-24 05:33:43 UTC

*** Bug 480519 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 23 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-24 05:34:10 UTC

*** Bug 478849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 24 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-24 05:34:22 UTC

*** Bug 476660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 25 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-24 05:34:51 UTC

*** Bug 487668 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 26 Matthew Barnes 2007-11-01 13:55:20 UTC

The stacktrace in comment #10 only shows GLib/GTK+ symbols.  Do we know for sure that this is an Evolution bug or should this be reassigned to GTK+?

Comment 27 Akhil Laddha 2008-01-24 10:10:41 UTC

*** Bug 509251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 28 Akhil Laddha 2008-01-24 10:10:54 UTC

*** Bug 510923 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 29 Akhil Laddha 2008-01-24 10:11:06 UTC

*** Bug 506894 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 30 Akhil Laddha 2008-02-14 05:37:28 UTC

*** Bug 512266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 31 Matthew Barnes 2008-03-06 02:33:11 UTC

Anyone seeing this on Fedora 8 or later?

Comment 32 Akhil Laddha 2008-03-25 14:18:24 UTC

*** Bug 493378 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 33 Tobias Mueller 2008-07-07 16:04:29 UTC

It seems as it is that bug introduced in fedora 8 whichs number I've forget. So I'm closing this is OBSOLETE.