Bug 428687 – crash in Evolution: Trying to decrypt an ema...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 428687 - crash in Evolution: Trying to decrypt an ema...


Summary:	crash in Evolution: Trying to decrypt an ema...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 378759

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	general
Version:	2.8.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-04-11 16:23 UTC by frankhieber
Modified:	2007-09-24 13:49 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description frankhieber 2007-04-11 16:23:57 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Trying to decrypt an email message.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 256462848 vsize: 0 resident: 256462848 share: 0 rss: 52781056 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1176307705 rtime: 0 utime: 1014 stime: 0 cutime:828 cstime: 0 timeout: 186 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232623952 (LWP 31508)]
[New Thread -1397822560 (LWP 31735)]
[New Thread -1344037984 (LWP 31558)]
[New Thread -1362154592 (LWP 31557)]
[New Thread -1353761888 (LWP 31556)]
[New Thread -1344316512 (LWP 31555)]
[New Thread -1335252064 (LWP 31525)]
[New Thread -1326859360 (LWP 31524)]
[New Thread -1287652448 (LWP 31522)]
[New Thread -1277039712 (LWP 31521)]
[New Thread -1267500128 (LWP 31519)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 126914

Thread 1 (Thread -1232623952 (LWP 31508))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 segv_redirect
at main.c line 426
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 strcmp
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 pass_response
at e-passwords.c line 782
#7 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_dialog_response
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_dialog_response
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_button_clicked
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_button_set_alignment
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_button_set_alignment
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#36 main
at main.c line 615
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Milan Crha 2007-09-24 13:49:54 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 378759 ***