After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 375347 - crash in Time and Date: kleinere Einstellungen v...
crash in Time and Date: kleinere Einstellungen v...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 358383
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: time-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-11-14 23:30 UTC by andreas
Modified: 2006-11-15 02:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description andreas 2006-11-14 23:30:21 UTC
Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
kleinere Einstellungen vorgenommen wie z.B. Screensaver ... ein wenig in dem erstmals installiertem ubuntu geschnüffelt... 	


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 38400000 vsize: 0 resident: 38400000 share: 0 rss: 15667200 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1163545793 rtime: 0 utime: 1622 stime: 0 cutime:1602 cstime: 0 timeout: 20 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/time-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225000688 (LWP 9341)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225000688 (LWP 9341))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_signal_handlers_unblock_matched
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-11-15 02:29:24 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358383 ***