GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 366048
crash in Terminal: creating a profile for t...
Last modified: 2007-02-10 19:34:01 UTC
Version: 2.16.1 What were you doing when the application crashed? creating a profile for terminal with the same name as a previously created profile Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy) Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 Memory status: size: 54906880 vsize: 0 resident: 54906880 share: 0 rss: 16502784 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1161986610 rtime: 0 utime: 115 stime: 0 cutime:34 cstime: 0 timeout: 81 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 10 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1226152272 (LWP 11451)] [New Thread -1249731680 (LWP 11455)] (no debugging symbols found) 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 79073
Thread 1 (Thread -1226152272 (LWP 11451))
This should be a duplicate of bug 363609. It is impossible to be sure from looking at the stack trace... Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for. Thanks!
*** Bug 387022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Additional stack trace....I hope this is what u wanted. Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy) Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 Memory status: size: 82497536 vsize: 0 resident: 82497536 share: 0 rss: 17235968 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1166503534 rtime: 0 utime: 128 stime: 0 cutime:116 cstime: 0 timeout: 12 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1226475856 (LWP 8451)] [New Thread -1280398432 (LWP 8457)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 95313
Thread 1 (Thread -1226475856 (LWP 8451))
*** Bug 390758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Hi Venkatesh, Unfortunately that stack trace is just like the previous one. Can you install debugging packages for gnome-terminal, gtk+, libvte, glib, pango, libgnome, libgnomeui, and then try to reproduce the crash? Thanks in advance!
Reopening because of duplicates.
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy) Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 Memory status: size: 82124800 vsize: 0 resident: 82124800 share: 0 rss: 16781312 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1167451684 rtime: 0 utime: 82 stime: 0 cutime:74 cstime: 0 timeout: 8 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1226795344 (LWP 9592)] [New Thread -1280738400 (LWP 9596)] 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 97937
Thread 1 (Thread -1226795344 (LWP 9592))
Venkatesh, thanks for the stack trace! :) Mariano, is it a dup?
*** Bug 394323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 406307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to comment #9) > Mariano, is it a dup? Yup, dupping. Thanks all. Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 363609 ***