Bug 363024 – crash in Evolution: opening the application ...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 363024 - crash in Evolution: opening the application ...


Summary:	crash in Evolution: opening the application ...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 361682

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	general
Version:	2.8.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-18 01:59 UTC by rubicam
Modified:	2006-12-17 17:52 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description rubicam 2006-10-18 01:59:18 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
opening the application I think it is a particular message in the preview pane triggering the crash


Distribution: Gentoo Base System version 1.12.5
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-14 (Gentoo)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 260136960 vsize: 260136960 resident: 33918976 share: 20762624 rss: 33918976 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1161136724 rtime: 270 utime: 240 stime: 30 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47188056674416 (LWP 7824)]
[New Thread 1126611280 (LWP 7875)]
[New Thread 1126345040 (LWP 7872)]
[New Thread 1117952336 (LWP 7850)]
[New Thread 1101166928 (LWP 7848)]
[New Thread 1109559632 (LWP 7847)]
[New Thread 1092774224 (LWP 7843)]
[New Thread 1084381520 (LWP 7842)]
[New Thread 1075988816 (LWP 7828)]
[New Thread 1073822032 (LWP 7827)]
0x00002aead07ef92f in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 76899

Thread 1 (Thread 47188056674416 (LWP 7824))

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 <signal handler called>
#3 raise
from /lib/libc.so.6
#4 abort
from /lib/libc.so.6
#5 mono_handle_native_sigsegv
from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0
#6 mono_resolve_patch_target
from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0
#7 <signal handler called>
#8 g_closure_ref
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_html_get_url_at
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15
#14 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit_by_name
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 html_image_factory_register
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15
#19 html_image_init
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15
#20 html_image_new
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15
#21 html_engine_add_object_with_id
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15
#22 html_engine_add_object_with_id
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15
#23 html_engine_update_focus_if_necessary
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15
#24 html_engine_flush
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15
#25 em_html_stream_new
from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
#26 em_sync_stream_get_type
from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
#27 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#28 g_main_context_acquire
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#31 main
#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 palfrey 2006-12-17 17:52:40 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 361682 ***