After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 210734 - alphabet list should use state-toggling buttons
alphabet list should use state-toggling buttons
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Chris Lahey
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks: 216096
 
 
Reported: 2001-09-24 06:30 UTC by Ben Liblit
Modified: 2013-09-10 14:02 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description Ben Liblit 2001-09-24 06:30:25 UTC
The A-Z buttons along the right edge of the address card view filter down
the set of displayed contacts to only those beginning with the selected
letter.  However, it is not always obvious that this filtering is in
effect.  Furthermore, it is unclear how to remove the filtering so that all
contacts are once again displayed.  I eventually discovered that Search ->
Clear would reset the filter, but this was extremely non-obvious, since the
state of the filter is not itself represented in the search bar.

I propose a subtle change to the alphabet list that should fix both
problems.  The buttons in this list should be toggle buttons.  When you
click on a button, it stays pressed in as long as its filter is in effect. 
If you click on a different button, the old button pops back out and the
new one stays pressed in.  If you click on a letter button that is already
pressed in, it pops out and the filter is removed.  Similarly, Search ->
Clear resets the filter and pops the active letter button back out.

Does that make sense?  Does it sould like a good idea?
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2001-09-29 18:38:18 UTC
Hrm. It actually sounds like a really good idea but it definitely
violates the UI and documentation freeze so it'll have to be post-1.0.
Comment 2 Chris Lahey 2001-11-08 10:03:10 UTC
This is a great great idea.  This is related as well to bug 212904.
Comment 3 Luis Villa 2001-11-26 17:04:34 UTC
Because of the decision to remap 1.1->1.2 and 1.2->1.4, I'm going to be
moving a large number of bugs around in the bugzilla. You can just
search on 'body contains' 'Because of the decision to remap' and mark
all as read. Please direct all questions about this change to
evolution@ximian.com, not the bug.
Luis

Comment 4 Ettore Perazzoli 2001-12-07 18:25:41 UTC
Major, as it's quite unusable right now.
Comment 5 Anna Marie Dirks 2001-12-12 21:54:50 UTC
I think that the search bar option menu should be made inactive, and
the search bar entry should read "Name begins with: A" or "Last name
begins with: A" or "Filed under: "A", whichever is truer. This reminds
the user again of which search is going on, and associates the
alphabetical sorting with the search bar, which makes it more clear
how to clear the search.

Anna. 
Comment 6 Chris Lahey 2002-01-11 06:07:02 UTC
Fixed in CVS.