After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 152389 - User should be able to drag remote folders to Trash
User should be able to drag remote folders to Trash
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 154283
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Trash
2.7.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-09-11 18:25 UTC by Keith Lea
Modified: 2005-01-03 00:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8

Attachments
Proposed Patch. (2.85 KB, patch)
2004-10-20 05:05 UTC, Dennis Cranston 		none Details | Review

Description Keith Lea 2004-09-11 18:25:44 UTC 
I have a remote connection on my desktop that I created using "Connect To
Server...". When I drag it to the trash, a dialog appears that says:

"You cannot delete a volume icon.

If you want to eject the volume, please use Eject in the right-click menu of the
volume."

This is unnecessary and unintuitive. I think that if a user drags such a
connection to the Trash, he or she obviously wants to remove it from his or her
desktop.
Comment 1 Dennis Cranston 2004-10-02 07:07:55 UTC 
There is a proposed patch in bug 154283 that should resolve this issue.
Comment 2 Keith Lea 2004-10-02 17:10:49 UTC 
I think this bug is a duplicate of bug 154283, or rather, it is a dupe of this
since mine came first. :)
Comment 3 Alexander Larsson 2004-10-05 08:19:24 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154283 ***
Comment 4 Dennis Cranston 2004-10-05 15:18:22 UTC 
No.  This bug is not resolved.  The dialog is wrong because there is no 'Eject'
menu.
Comment 5 Matthew Gatto 2004-10-19 20:15:19 UTC 
dennis_cranston@yahoo.com: there is already bug 152391 for the Eject/Unmount
distinction needed in the error message. Could you rework your patch to fix that
bug?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154283 ***
Comment 6 Dennis Cranston 2004-10-20 05:05:10 UTC 
Created attachment 32813 [details] [review]
Proposed Patch.
Comment 7 Luis Villa 2005-01-03 00:22:20 UTC 
Dennis, should this patch be moved to another bug? I'm trying to follow the web
of dups/deps/etc. here, but I'm afraid I can't make much sense of the situation.
Comment 8 Dennis Cranston 2005-01-03 00:29:18 UTC 
Luis,  Moving the patch seems reasonable.  I attached it to bug 152391.  Thanks.