After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 135416 - Application Crash
Application Crash
Status: VERIFIED INCOMPLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File and Folder Operations
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-02-25 18:16 UTC by studioricci
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description studioricci 2004-02-25 18:17:07 UTC
Package: nautilus
Severity: blocker
Version: 2.2.1
Synopsis: Application Crash
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: File and Folder Operations
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1)

Description:
Description of Problem:


Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 16384 (LWP 4971)]
[New Thread 32769 (LWP 4982)]
[New Thread 16386 (LWP 4983)]
[New Thread 32771 (LWP 4984)]
[New Thread 49156 (LWP 4985)]
[New Thread 65541 (LWP 5113)]
0x40b848b4 in __libc_waitpid (pid=5370, 
    stat_loc=0xbffff0fc, options=0) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c:32
32	  int result = INLINE_SYSCALL (wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options,
NULL);

Thread 1 (Thread 16384 (LWP 4971))

  • #0 __libc_waitpid
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c line 32
  • #1 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 __pthread_sighandler
    at sighandler.c line 38
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance_is_a
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 gdk_event_translate
    at gdkevents-x11.c line 822
  • #6 _gdk_events_queue
    at gdkevents-x11.c line 2028
  • #7 gdk_event_dispatch
    at gdkevents-x11.c line 2088
  • #8 unblock_source
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_main
    at gtkmain.c line 1158
  • #13 main
  • #14 __libc_start_main
    at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c line 193




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-02-25 13:17 -------

The original reporter (studioricci@freemail.it) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 Heather Flanagan 2004-02-25 22:14:22 UTC
Checked for dups - nothing came up in
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/simple-dup-finder.cgi?id=135416
Don't have tools here to confirm, tho'.
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2004-02-25 22:35:11 UTC
studioricci@freemail.it: what version of gtk were you using? I think
this may be a duplicate of bug 117579, but that is only against gtk 2.3.

Heather: to find that, I 'just' searched the bodies on the first
'useful' function in the stack trace (g_type_check_instance_is_a) and
looked through those returns. That pointed me at bug 128424, which
pointed me at 117579. I'm not sure why the dup finder didn't pick up
128424, I'll try to look into that.
Comment 3 Martin Wehner 2004-09-16 20:45:24 UTC
No new info -> closing.