After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 686884 - Signature duplicated, stripped off inline reply
Signature duplicated, stripped off inline reply
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 684249
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
3.6.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
evolution[signatures]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-10-25 18:59 UTC by jolish
Modified: 2012-10-25 20:26 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description jolish 2012-10-25 18:59:04 UTC
When replying a mail, the signature duplicates. If the signature was already on the original mail, it is moved to the top.

Settings:
    Reply style: Inline (Outlook style)
    Add a Signature
    Assign signature as default
    Signature above original message

Steps to reproduce:
    Have someone send you a mail.
    Click on "Reply".
    The signature appears double one after the other.
    Send that reply.
    Have your friend reply your mail.
    Reply your friend's new mail.
    The signature appears three times, and both of the signatures of the previous email are removed.
    Continue sending replys and watch your signatures accumulate at the top. :)

It seems that all of your signatures from the inline reply are moved to the top, but that's not the whole problem since when you first reply a mail that doesn't has your signature on it, you still get two signatures.

PS. I didn't find any similar bug logged.
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2012-10-25 19:32:06 UTC
Likely related to bug 684249, which is fixed in Evolution 3.6.1.
Comment 2 jolish 2012-10-25 20:22:22 UTC
I had a look at that bug... It seems to be the same case. Sorry for duplicating. :S
Comment 3 Matthew Barnes 2012-10-25 20:26:20 UTC
No problem.  Thanks for confirming.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 684249 ***