After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 649176 - QT app icons are one pixel in notification area
QT app icons are one pixel in notification area
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: notification area
2.32.x
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Panel Maintainers
Panel Maintainers
: 649280 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-05-02 12:18 UTC by Kay
Modified: 2011-10-14 05:22 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Kay 2011-05-02 12:18:36 UTC
When I'm running skype, icon in notification area is 1x1 pixel size, same for VLC.
I think other QT apps have the same problem.
If I remove notification area applet and add it again, icons appear at normal size.
Reproduces every time for me, few others reported random behavior. 

Corresponding ubuntu bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skype/+bug/764828

OS: Ubuntu 11.04 natty, Classic mode.
Gnome-Panel 1:2.32.1-0ubunbu6.4
Skype 2.2.0.25-1maverick1
VLC 1.1.9-1ubuntu1
Comment 1 André Klapper 2011-05-02 13:05:14 UTC
Why do you think that this is a gnome-panel bug?
Comment 2 Kay 2011-05-02 13:13:39 UTC
Because it's the only related thing that changed in natty.
VLC and skype versions are the same as in maverick.
Comment 4 Vincent Untz 2011-05-02 14:19:40 UTC
Nearly sure this is one of the bugs I fixed in GNOME 3.0. So if someone can check with GNOME 3.0 in fallback mode, that'd be great.
Comment 5 André Klapper 2011-05-03 21:01:52 UTC
*** Bug 649280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Deomid Ryabkov 2011-05-05 23:07:16 UTC
Vincent, so what if it is? This needs to be fixed in 2.32.
it's a serious regression, please expedite the fix.
Comment 7 Vincent Untz 2011-05-06 10:13:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Vincent, so what if it is? This needs to be fixed in 2.32.
> it's a serious regression, please expedite the fix.

Sorry, it doesn't work this way. Someone would need to check it does fix this issue, that it works fine, and that it introduces no regression. Volunteers are welcome -- on my side, I'm not focusing my work on 2.32.
Comment 8 Gianfranco Costamagna 2011-05-06 11:26:15 UTC
(fowarding from lp)

Just unlocking the notification area and restarting skype caused the bug to go away.
Probably something related to resizing.

by Charles
Comment 9 paul 2011-05-06 11:29:19 UTC
As described in my own Bug-Report ( https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649280 ), for me it doesn't work most of the time to just restart the application or the program
Comment 10 Berend De Schouwer 2011-05-23 10:53:18 UTC
This bug is fixed for me in Gnome3.

"fixed" is not the right word since Gnome3 doesn't appear to run gnome-panel.  gnome-shell 3.0.1-0ubuntu1~build1
Comment 11 Akhil Laddha 2011-07-07 05:05:50 UTC
Shall we close the bug as it seems to be fixed in GNOME3 ?
Comment 12 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2011-07-07 05:46:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #11)
> Shall we close the bug as it seems to be fixed in GNOME3 ?

I do not think so.  It seems Berend did not try the fallback mode in GNOME3, which runs gnome-panel.
Comment 13 Berend De Schouwer 2011-07-07 11:51:43 UTC
Unfortunately I seem to have Gnome2's panel instead of Gnome3's panel... Doh!

However,  the original Ubuntu bug has today been closed with gnome-panel=>invalid because it was fixed in compiz instead.  See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/767095
Comment 14 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2011-08-29 00:54:49 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
> Unfortunately I seem to have Gnome2's panel instead of Gnome3's panel... Doh!
> 
> However,  the original Ubuntu bug has today been closed with
> gnome-panel=>invalid because it was fixed in compiz instead.  See
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/767095

As per comment 13, can we close the bug?
Comment 15 Akhil Laddha 2011-10-14 05:22:34 UTC
Closing bug in upstream as it has been closed in downstream.